ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2015
Focusing on shared subpockets - new developments in fragment-based drug discovery.
Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Compounds Targeting the RNA-Binding Protein HuR. Structure-Based Design, Synthesis, and Interaction Studies.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2019Article
- Baicalin positively regulates osteoclast function by activating MAPK/Mitf signalling.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionProtein-protein interactions (PPIs) are important targets for understanding fundamental biology and for the development of therapeutic agents. Based on different physicochemical properties, numerous pieces of software (e.g., POCKETQUERY, ANCHORQUERY and FTMap) have been reported to find pockets on protein surfaces and have applications in facilitating the design and discovery of small-molecular-weight compounds that bind to these pockets. AREAS COVERED: The authors discuss a pocket-centric method of analyzing PPI interfaces, which prioritize their pockets for small-molecule drug discovery and the importance of multicomponent reaction chemistry as starting points for undruggable targets. The authors also provide their perspectives on the field. EXPERT OPINION: Only the tight interplay of efficient computational methods capable of screening a large chemical space and fast synthetic chemistry will lead to progress in the rational design of PPI antagonists in the future. Early drug discovery platforms will also benefit from efficient rapid feedback loops from early clinical research back to molecular design and the medicinal chemistry bench.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.