ArticlePloS one2015
Adhesion Potential of Intestinal Microbes Predicted by Physico-Chemical Characterization Methods.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the Probiotic Properties and safety of Limosilactobacillus reuteri LP4 Isolated from Apis cerana Based on Whole Genome and Phenotype Analyses.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetic Profiling UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Unlocking Probiotic Potential: Physicochemical Approaches to Evaluate Probiotic Bacterial Adhesion Potential to the Intestinal Tract.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2025Article
- Dynamics of gut colonization by commensal and pathogenic bacteria that attach to the intestinal epithelium.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- Identification of safe putative probiotics from various food products.Folia microbiologica · 2024Article
- Article
- Adhesion ofVeterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Whole Genome Sequencing of the Novel Probiotic StrainMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Ultrasound can increase biofilm formation byFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Gut microbiota in various childhood disorders: Implication and indications.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Ex-Vivo Adhesion ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Rehydration before Application Improves Functional Properties of LyophilizedMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Effect of Silk Fibroin Biomaterial Coating on Cell Viability and Intestinal Adhesion of Probiotic Bacteria.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Ultrasonic Modulation of the Technological and Functional Properties of Yeast Strains.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Microencapsulation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Swimming and rafting of E.coli microcolonies at air-liquid interfaces.MicrobiologyOpen · 2018Article
- Exploration of the role of the virulence factor ElrA during Enterococcus faecalis cell infection.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Mutation of the Surface Layer Protein SlpB Has Pleiotropic Effects in the ProbioticFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial adhesion to epithelial surfaces affects retention time in the human gastro-intestinal tract and therefore significantly contributes to interactions between bacteria and their hosts. Bacterial adhesion among other factors is strongly influenced by physico-chemical factors. The accurate quantification of these physico-chemical factors in adhesion is however limited by the available measuring techniques. We evaluated surface charge, interfacial rheology and tensiometry (interfacial tension) as novel approaches to quantify these interactions and evaluated their biological significance via an adhesion assay using intestinal epithelial surface molecules (IESM) for a set of model organisms present in the human gastrointestinal tract. Strain pairs of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 with its sortase knockout mutant Lb. plantarum NZ7114 and Lb. rhamnosus GG with Lb. rhamnosus DSM 20021T were used with Enterococcus faecalis JH2-2 as control organism. Intra-species comparison revealed significantly higher abilities for Lb. plantarum WCSF1 and Lb. rhamnosus GG vs. Lb. plantarum NZ7114 and Lb. rhamnosus DSM 20021T to dynamically increase interfacial elasticity (10-2 vs. 10-3 Pa*m) and reduce interfacial tension (32 vs. 38 mN/m). This further correlated for Lb. plantarum WCSF1 and Lb. rhamnosus GG vs. Lb. plantarum NZ7114 and Lb. rhamnosus DSM 20021T with the decrease of relative hydrophobicity (80-85% vs. 57-63%), Zeta potential (-2.9 to -4.5 mV vs. -8.0 to -13.8 mV) and higher relative adhesion capacity to IESM (3.0-5.0 vs 1.5-2.2). Highest adhesion to the IESM collagen I and fibronectin was found for Lb. plantarum WCFS1 (5.0) and E. faecalis JH2-2 (4.2) whereas Lb. rhamnosus GG showed highest adhesion to type II mucus (3.8). Significantly reduced adhesion (2 fold) to the tested IESM was observed for Lb. plantarum NZ7114 and Lb. rhamnosus DSM 20021T corresponding with lower relative hydrophobicity, Zeta potential and abilities to modify interfacial elasticity and tension. Conclusively, the use of Zeta potential, interfacial elasticity and interfacial tension are proposed as suitable novel descriptive and predictive parameters to study the interactions of intestinal microbes with their hosts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.