Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26295581›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Comparative Analysis of Two Gene-Targeting Approaches Challenges the Tumor-Suppressive Role of the Protein Kinase MK5/PRAK.

Natalia Ronkina, Claus Johansen, Lisa Bohlmann, Juri Lafera, Manoj B Menon, Christopher Tiedje, Kathrin Laaß, Benjamin E Turk, Lars Iversen, Alexey Kotlyarov and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. MAPK-Activated Protein Kinases (MKs): Novel Insights and Challenges.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Natalia RonkinaDepartment of Biochemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Claus JohansenDepartment of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Lisa BohlmannDepartment of Biochemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Juri LaferaDepartment of Biochemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Manoj B MenonDepartment of Biochemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Christopher TiedjeDepartment of Biochemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Kathrin LaaßDepartment of Biochemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Benjamin E TurkDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States of America.
Lars IversenDepartment of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Alexey KotlyarovDepartment of Biochemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Matthias GaestelDepartment of Biochemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEAarhus University Hospital · DKYale University · US

Funding

Modeling human phosphorylation networks through kinome-wide profilingR01GM104047 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TURK, BENJAMIN E, YAFFE, MICHAEL B · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MK5 (MAPK-activated protein kinase 5) or PRAK (p38-regulated and -activated kinase) are alternative names for a serine/threonine protein kinase downstream to ERK3/4 and p38 MAPK. A previous gene targeting approach for MK5/PRAK (termed here MK5/PRAK-Δex8) revealed a seemingly tumor-suppressive role of MK5/PRAK in DMBA-induced one step skin carcinogenesis and Ras-induced transformation. Here we demonstrate that an alternative targeting strategy of MK5/PRAK (termed MK5/PRAK-Δex6) increased neither tumor incidence in the one step skin carcinogenesis model, nor Ras-induced transformation in primary cells. Interestingly, due to the targeting strategies and exon skipping both knockouts do not completely abolish the generation of MK5/PRAK protein, but express MK5/PRAK deletion mutants with different biochemical properties depending on the exon targeted: Targeting of exon 6 leads to expression of an unstable cytoplasmic catalytically inactive MK5/PRAK-Δex6 mutant while targeting of exon 8 results in a more stable nuclear MK5/PRAK-Δex8 mutant with residual catalytic activity. The different properties of the MK5/PRAK deletion mutants could be responsible for the observed discrepancy between the knockout strains and challenge the role of MK5/PRAK in p53-dependent tumor suppression. Further MK5/PRAK knockout and knock-in mouse strains will be necessary to assign a physiological function to MK5/PRAK in this model organism.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedExonsGene DeletionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Knockout TechniquesHEK293 CellsHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMice, Inbred C57BLProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein StabilityRNA InterferenceRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingSkinIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMAP-kinase-activated kinase 5Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26295581
PMCPMC4546416
OpenAlexW1836306146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.