Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26295344›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Adaptation and Evaluation of a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Model for Lyme Disease Prevention.

Cécile Aenishaenslin, Lise Gern, Pascal Michel, André Ravel, Valérie Hongoh, Jean-Philippe Waaub, François Milord, Denise Bélanger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cécile AenishaenslinResearch Group on Epidemiology of Zoonoses and Public Health, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada; Département de pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
Lise GernLaboratoire d'Eco-Épidémiologie, Institut de Biologie, Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Suisse.
Pascal MichelResearch Group on Epidemiology of Zoonoses and Public Health, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada; Laboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
André RavelDépartement de pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
Valérie HongohResearch Group on Epidemiology of Zoonoses and Public Health, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada; Département de pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
Jean-Philippe WaaubGroup for Research in Decision Analysis (GERAD), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
François MilordInstitut national de santé publique du Québec, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada.
Denise BélangerResearch Group on Epidemiology of Zoonoses and Public Health, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada; Département de pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CAGroup for Research in Decision Analysis · CAInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAUniversity of Neuchâtel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designing preventive programs relevant to vector-borne diseases such as Lyme disease (LD) can be complex given the need to include multiple issues and perspectives into prioritizing public health actions. A multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA) model was previously used to rank interventions for LD prevention in Quebec, Canada, where the disease is emerging. The aim of the current study was to adapt and evaluate the decision model constructed in Quebec under a different epidemiological context, in Switzerland, where LD has been endemic for the last thirty years. The model adaptation was undertaken with a group of Swiss stakeholders using a participatory approach. The PROMETHEE method was used for multi-criteria analysis. Key elements and results of the MCDA model are described and contrasted with the Quebec model. All criteria and most interventions of the MCDA model developed for LD prevention in Quebec were directly transferable to the Swiss context. Four new decision criteria were added, and the list of proposed interventions was modified. Based on the overall group ranking, interventions targeting human populations were prioritized in the Swiss model, with the top ranked action being the implementation of a large communication campaign. The addition of criteria did not significantly alter the intervention rankings, but increased the capacity of the model to discriminate between highest and lowest ranked interventions. The current study suggests that beyond the specificity of the MCDA models developed for Quebec and Switzerland, their general structure captures the fundamental and common issues that characterize the complexity of vector-borne disease prevention. These results should encourage public health organizations to adapt, use and share MCDA models as an effective and functional approach to enable the integration of multiple perspectives and considerations in the prevention and control of complex public health issues such as Lyme disease or other vector-borne and zoonotic diseases.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesModels, StatisticalAcaricidesAnimalsBorrelia burgdorferiEpidemiological MonitoringHumansIxodesLyme DiseasePublic HealthQuebecSwitzerlandTick ControlZoonosesAcaricides

Identifiers

PMID26295344
PMCPMC4546612
OpenAlexW1878420379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.