Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26294093›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2015

Building spatial composite indicators to analyze environmental health inequalities on a regional scale.

Mahdi-Salim Saib, Julien Caudeville, Maxime Beauchamp, Florence Carré, Olivier Ganry, Alain Trugeon, Andre Cicolella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparing Global and Spatial Composite Measures of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status Across US Counties.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2022
    Article
  2. Inequalities in Health: Methodological Approaches to Spatial Differentiation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Local Geographic Variation of Public Services Inequality: Does the Neighborhood Scale Matter?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahdi-Salim SaibFrench National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks, Parc Technologique Alata,BP 2, 60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France. saib.mahdi.s@gmail.com.
Julien CaudevilleFrench National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks, Parc Technologique Alata,BP 2, 60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
Maxime BeauchampFrench National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks, Parc Technologique Alata,BP 2, 60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
Florence CarréFrench National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks, Parc Technologique Alata,BP 2, 60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
Olivier GanryEpidemiology and public health department, University hospital of Amiens, Amiens, France.
Alain TrugeonRegional Observatory of Health and Social Issues in Picardie, Amiens, France.
Andre CicolellaFrench National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks, Parc Technologique Alata,BP 2, 60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReducing health inequalities involves the identification and characterization of social and exposure factors and the way they accumulate in a given area. The areas of accumulation then allow for prioritization of interventions. The present study aims to build spatial composite indicators based on the aggregation of environmental, social and health indicators and their inter-relationships.

methodPreliminary work was carried out firstly to homogenize spatial coverage, and secondly to study spatial variation of environmental (EI), socioeconomic (SI) and health (HI) indicators. The aggregation of the different indicators was performed using several methodologies for which results and decision-makers' usability were compared.

resultsFour methodologies were tested: 1) A simple summation of normalized HI, EI and SI indicators (IC), 2) the sum of the normalized HI, EI and SI indicators weighted by the first principal component of a Principal Component Analysis (IC PCA), 3) the sum of normalized and weighted indicators of the first principal component of Local Principal Component Analysis (IC LPCA), and 4) the sum of normalized and weighted indicators of the first principal component of a Geographically Weighted Principal Component Analysis (IC GWPCA).

conclusionThe GWPCA is particularly adapted to taking into account the spatial heterogeneity and the spatial autocorrelation between SI, EI and HI. This approach invalidates the basic assumptions of many standard statistical analyses. Where socioeconomic indicators present high deprivation and where they are associated with potential modifiable health determinants, decision-makers can prioritize these areas for reducing inequalities by controlling the socioeconomic and health determinants.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEnvironmental HealthFemaleFranceGeographyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpatial AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26294093
PMCPMC4546175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.