Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26294048›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Natural disturbance reduces disease risk in endangered rainforest frog populations.

Elizabeth A Roznik, Sarah J Sapsford, David A Pike, Lin Schwarzkopf, Ross A Alford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Royal Society open science · 2026
    Article
  2. How wildlife respond to tropical cyclones: short-term tactics and long-term impacts.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gut microbiomes are largely unchanged when exposed to their amphibian host's latitudinally variable upper thermal limit.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mitigating amphibian chytridiomycoses in nature.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth A RoznikCollege of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
Sarah J SapsfordCollege of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
David A PikeCollege of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
Lin SchwarzkopfCollege of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
Ross A AlfordCollege of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural disturbances can drive disease dynamics in animal populations by altering the microclimates experienced by hosts and their pathogens. Many pathogens are highly sensitive to temperature and moisture, and therefore small changes in habitat structure can alter the microclimate in ways that increase or decrease infection prevalence and intensity in host populations. Here we show that a reduction of rainforest canopy cover caused by a severe tropical cyclone decreased the risk of endangered rainforest frogs (Litoria rheocola) becoming infected by a fungal pathogen (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis). Reductions in canopy cover increased the temperatures and rates of evaporative water loss in frog microhabitats, which reduced B. dendrobatidis infection risk in frogs by an average of 11-28% in cyclone-damaged areas, relative to unaffected areas. Natural disturbances to the rainforest canopy can therefore provide an immediate benefit to frogs by altering the microclimate in ways that reduce infection risk. This could increase host survival and reduce the probability of epidemic disease outbreaks. For amphibian populations under immediate threat from this pathogen, targeted manipulation of canopy cover could increase the availability of warmer, drier microclimates and therefore tip the balance from host extinction to coexistence.

Indexed as

Cyclonic StormsEndangered SpeciesRainforestAnimalsAnuraAustraliaChytridiomycotaDisease SusceptibilityForestsLinear ModelsProbabilitySample SizeTemperature

Identifiers

PMID26294048
PMCPMC4544035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.