Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26293867›Full record

ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2015

Recent Advances in Clinical Natural Language Processing in Support of Semantic Analysis.

S Velupillai, D Mowery, B R South, M Kvist, H Dalianis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Analysis of Inter-Domain and Cross-Domain Drug Review Polarity Classification.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S VelupillaiSumithra Velupillai, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Postbox 7003, 164 07 Kista, Sweden, Tel: +46 8 161 174, Fax: +46 8 703 9025, E-mail: sumithra@dsv.su.se.
D Mowery
B R South
M Kvist
H Dalianis

Funding

Interactive Search and Review of Clinical Records with Multi-Layered Semantic AnnotationsR01LM010964 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CHAPMAN, WENDY W., HWA, REBECCA · 2011 to 2014
$2.3M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe present a review of recent advances in clinical Natural Language Processing (NLP), with a focus on semantic analysis and key subtasks that support such analysis.

methodsWe conducted a literature review of clinical NLP research from 2008 to 2014, emphasizing recent publications (2012-2014), based on PubMed and ACL proceedings as well as relevant referenced publications from the included papers.

resultsSignificant articles published within this time-span were included and are discussed from the perspective of semantic analysis. Three key clinical NLP subtasks that enable such analysis were identified: 1) developing more efficient methods for corpus creation (annotation and de-identification), 2) generating building blocks for extracting meaning (morphological, syntactic, and semantic subtasks), and 3) leveraging NLP for clinical utility (NLP applications and infrastructure for clinical use cases). Finally, we provide a reflection upon most recent developments and potential areas of future NLP development and applications.

conclusionsThere has been an increase of advances within key NLP subtasks that support semantic analysis. Performance of NLP semantic analysis is, in many cases, close to that of agreement between humans. The creation and release of corpora annotated with complex semantic information models has greatly supported the development of new tools and approaches. Research on non-English languages is continuously growing. NLP methods have sometimes been successfully employed in real-world clinical tasks. However, there is still a gap between the development of advanced resources and their utilization in clinical settings. A plethora of new clinical use cases are emerging due to established health care initiatives and additional patient-generated sources through the extensive use of social media and other devices.

Indexed as

Data AnonymizationNatural Language ProcessingSemanticsCoumarinsData CollectionElectronic Health RecordsIsocoumarins7-N-phenylcarbamoylamino-4-chloro-3-propyloxyisocoumarinCoumarinsIsocoumarinsAnnotationClinical Natural Language ProcessingDomain AdaptationInformation ExtractionReviewSemantics

Identifiers

PMID26293867
PMCPMC4587060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.