Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26293854›Full record

ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2015

Findings from the Clinical Information Systems Perspective.

T Ganslandt, W O Hackl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T GanslandtDr. med. Thomas Ganslandt, Medizinisches IK-Zentrum, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Glückstr. 11, DE-91054 Erlangen, Germany, Tel +49 9131 85-36712, E-mail: thomas.ganslandt@uk-erlangen.de.
W O HacklDr. Werner O Hackl, Institute of Biomedical Informatics, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and, Technology, Eduard-Wallnoefer-Zentrum 1, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria, Tel: +43 50 8648 3806, E-mail: werner.hackl@umit.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarize recent research and to propose a selection of best papers published in 2014 in the field of Clinical Information Systems (CIS).

methodA query with search terms from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) catalog as well as additional free text search terms was designed to identify relevant publications in the field of clinical information systems from PubMed and Web of Science®. The retrieved articles were then categorized in a multi-pass review carried out separately by the section editors. The final selection of 15 candidate papers was then peerreviewed by Yearbook editors and external reviewers. Based on the review results the four best papers were then selected at the best papers selection meeting with the IMIA Yearbook editorial board.

resultsThe query was carried out in mid-January 2015, yielding a combined result set of 1525 articles which were published in 722 different journals. Among these articles two main thematic sections were identified: i) Interoperability from a syntactical and semantic point of view as well as from a longterm preservation and organizational/legal point of view and ii) secondary use of existing health data in all its shades. Here, patient safety was a major scope of application.

conclusionsCIS have become mature over the last years. The focus has now moved beyond data acquisition for just supporting the local care workflows. Actual research efforts in the CIS domain comprise the breakdown of information silos, the reduction of barriers between different systems of different care providers and secondary use of accumulated health data for multiple purposes.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient SafetyAlgorithmsHumansMeaningful UseMedical InformaticsSystems Integrationclinical information systemsInternational Medical Informatics AssociationMedical informaticsyearbook

Identifiers

PMID26293854
PMCPMC4587054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.