Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26293847›Full record

ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2015

Informatics Systems and Tools to Facilitate Patient-centered Care Coordination.

G Demiris, L Kneale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimizing medication guidance support for patients with cancer pain: development and evaluation of a pharmaceutical care system for healthcare professionals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  2. Exploring the Need for Mobile Application in Stroke Management by Informal Caregivers: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Investigating the effect of the Vula Mobile app on coordination of care and capacity building in district health services, Cape Town: Convergent mixed methods study.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Therapeutic Inertia: Still a Long Way to Go That Cannot Be Postponed.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G DemirisGeorge Demiris PhD, FACMI, University of Washington, BNHS Box 357266, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA, Tel: +1 206 221 3866, Fax: +1 206 543 4771, E-mail: gdemiris@uw.edu.
L Kneale

Funding

University of Washington Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Research Training ProgramT15LM007442 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN H. GENNARI, Andrea L. Hartzler · 2002 to 2026
$19.6M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a growing international focus on patient- centered care. A model designed to facilitate this type of care in the primary care setting is the patient-centered medical home. This model of care strives to be patient-focused, comprehensive, team-based, coordinated, accessible, and focused on quality and safety of care.

objectiveThe objective of this paper is to identify the current status and future trends of patient-centered care and the role of informatics systems and tools in facilitating this model of care.

methodsIn this paper we review recent scientific literature of the past four years to identify trends and state of current evidence when it comes to patient-centered care overall, and more specifically medical homes.

resultsThere are several studies that indicate growth and development in seven informatics areas within patient-centered care, namely clinical decision support, registries, team care, care transitions, personal health records, telehealth, and measurement. In some cases we are still lacking large randomized clinical trials and the evidence base is not always solid, but findings strongly indicate the potential of informatics to support patient-centered care.

conclusionCurrent evidence indicates that advancements have been made in implementing and evaluating patient-centered care models. Technical, legal, and practical challenges still remain. Further examination of the impact of patient-centered informatics tools and systems on clinical outcomes is needed.

Indexed as

Medical InformaticsPatient-Centered CareDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHealth Records, PersonalHumansPatient Care ManagementTelemedicineclinicaldecision support systemsPatient-centered carepersonal health recordsregistriestelehealth

Identifiers

PMID26293847
PMCPMC4587048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.