Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26293839›Full record

ArticlePeritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis2015

Novel Equations for Estimating Lean Body Mass in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Jie Dong, Yan-Jun Li, Rong Xu, Zhi-Kai Yang, Ying-Dong Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jie DongRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital Institute of Nephrology, Peking University Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China dongjie@medmail.com.cn.
Yan-Jun LiRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital Institute of Nephrology, Peking University Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.
Rong XuRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital Institute of Nephrology, Peking University Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.
Zhi-Kai YangRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital Institute of Nephrology, Peking University Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.
Ying-Dong ZhengDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelled♦

objectivesTo develop and validate equations for estimating lean body mass (LBM) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. ♦

methodsTwo equations for estimating LBM, one based on mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) and hand grip strength (HGS), i.e., LBM-M-H, and the other based on HGS, i.e., LBM-H, were developed and validated with LBM obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The developed equations were compared to LBM estimated from creatinine kinetics (LBM-CK) and anthropometry (LBM-A) in terms of bias, precision, and accuracy. The prognostic values of LBM estimated from the equations in all-cause mortality risk were assessed. ♦

resultsThe developed equations incorporated gender, height, weight, and dialysis duration. Compared to LBM-DEXA, the bias of the developed equations was lower than that of LBM-CK and LBM-A. Additionally, LBM-M-H and LBM-H had better accuracy and precision. The prognostic values of LBM in all-cause mortality risk based on LBM-M-H, LBM-H, LBM-CK, and LBM-A were similar. ♦

conclusionsLean body mass estimated by the new equations based on MAMC and HGS was correlated with LBM obtained by DEXA and may serve as practical surrogate markers of LBM in PD patients.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBody CompositionPeritoneal DialysisAdultAgedBody Mass IndexFemaleHand StrengthHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalRetrospective Studiesanthropometrycreatinine kineticsdual-energy X-ray absorptiometryhand grip strengthLean body massmid-arm muscle circumferencemortalityperitoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID26293839
PMCPMC4690630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.