Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26293830›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2015

Barley landraces are characterized by geographically heterogeneous genomic origins.

Ana M Poets, Zhou Fang, Michael T Clegg, Peter L Morrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. On the origin of the late-flowering ppd-H1 allele in barley.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Flowering time genes branching out.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Biocultural diversity and crop improvement.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genetic diversity, distribution and domestication history of the neglected GGATAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana M PoetsDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA. agonzale@umn.edu.
Zhou FangDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA. zhou.fang1@bayer.com.
Michael T CleggDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. mclegg@uci.edu.
Peter L MorrellDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA. pmorrell@umn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genetic provenance of domesticated plants and the routes along which they were disseminated in prehistory have been a long-standing source of debate. Much of this debate has focused on identifying centers of origins for individual crops. However, many important crops show clear genetic signatures of multiple domestications, inconsistent with geographically circumscribed centers of origin. To better understand the genetic contributions of wild populations to domesticated barley, we compare single nucleotide polymorphism frequencies from 803 barley landraces to 277 accessions from wild populations.

resultsWe find that the genetic contribution of individual wild populations differs across the genome. Despite extensive human movement and admixture of barley landraces since domestication, individual landrace genomes indicate a pattern of shared ancestry with geographically proximate wild barley populations. This results in landraces with a mosaic of ancestry from multiple source populations rather than discrete centers of origin. We rule out recent introgression, suggesting that these contributions are ancient. The over-representation in landraces of genomic segments from local wild populations suggests that wild populations contributed locally adaptive variation to primitive varieties.

conclusionsThis study increases our understanding of the evolutionary process associated with the transition from wild to domesticated barley. Our findings indicate that cultivated barley is comprised of multiple source populations with unequal contributions traceable across the genome. We detect putative adaptive variants and identify the wild progenitor conferring those variants.

Indexed as

AllelesGenome, PlantGenomicsHordeumPhylogeographyPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID26293830
PMCPMC4546095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.