Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26293742›Full record

Trial reportCNS drugs2015

Safety of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Data from the Italian National ADHD Registry.

Samuele Cortese, Pietro Panei, Romano Arcieri, Elena A P Germinario, Annalisa Capuano, Lucia Margari, Flavia Chiarotti, Paolo Curatolo

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in CNS drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparison of the real-world safety of two different long-acting methylphenidate formulations (MedikinetScandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. ADHD: Reviewing the Causes and Evaluating Solutions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Samuele CorteseDevelopmental Brain-Behaviour Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton, UK. samuele.cortese@gmail.com.
Pietro PaneiDepartment of Therapeutic Research and Medicines Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161, Rome, Italy. pietro.panei@iss.it.
Romano ArcieriDepartment of Therapeutic Research and Medicines Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Elena A P GerminarioDepartment of Therapeutic Research and Medicines Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Annalisa CapuanoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Regional Center of Pharmacosurveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Lucia MargariChild Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Hospital Polyclinic of Bari, University Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Flavia ChiarottiDepartment of Cell Biology and Neurosciences, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Paolo CuratoloSystems Medicine Department, Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Tor Vergata University Hospital of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the type and frequency of adverse events (AEs) in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treated with methylphenidate or atomoxetine over a 5-year period in a large naturalistic study.

methodsWe draw on data from the Italian ADHD Registry, a national database for postmarketing phase IV pharmacovigilance of ADHD medications across 90 centers. AEs were defined as severe or mild as per the classification of the Italian Medicines Agency. AE frequency in the two treatment groups was compared using incidence rates per 100 person-years (IR100PY) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Mantel-Haenszel adjusted IRRs were calculated to control for psychiatric comorbidity.

resultsA total of 1350 and 753 participants (aged 6-18 years, mean age 10.7 ± 2.8) were treated with methylphenidate and atomoxetine, respectively, from 2007 to 2012. Ninety participants (7 %) were switched from methylphenidate to atomoxetine, and 138 (18 %) from atomoxetine to methylphenidate. Thirty-seven children treated with atomoxetine and 12 with methylphenidate had their medication withdrawn. Overall, 645 patients (26.8 %) experienced at least one mild AE (including decreased appetite and irritability, for both drugs) and 95 patients (3.9 %) experienced at least one severe AE (including severe gastrointestinal events). IR100PY were significantly higher in the atomoxetine-treated group compared with the methylphenidate-treated group for a number of mild and severe AEs and for any severe or mild AEs. After controlling for comorbidities, IRR was still significantly higher in the atomoxetine group compared with the methylphenidate group for a number of mild (decreased appetite, weight loss, abdominal pain, dyspepsia, stomach ache, irritability, mood disorder and dizziness) and severe (gastrointestinal, neuropsychiatric, and cardiovascular) AEs.

conclusionsIn this naturalistic study, methylphenidate had a better safety profile than atomoxetine.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsChildComorbidityFemaleHumansIncidenceItalyMaleMethylphenidatePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotropic DrugsRegistriesAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidatePsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID26293742
OpenAlexW1667247919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.