ArticleClinical drug investigation2015
Higher risk of sulfonylurea-associated hypoglycemic symptoms in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disentangling Sex Differences in Sulfonylurea Drug Response With Genome-Wide Association Studies in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Predicting Risk of Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes by Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning: Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough some evidence suggests that women may be at greater risk for hypoglycemia, no conclusion has been reached, and female sex has not been taken into account in antidiabetic drug-induced hypoglycemia. This study aimed to determine whether females are at a higher risk of sulfonylurea (SU)-associated hypoglycemia in daily clinical practice.
methodsThe incidence of adverse reactions of SU was investigated in 2119 Japanese patients who participated in the Drug Event Monitoring project of the Japan Pharmaceutical Association, which was conducted in Kumamoto prefecture. A multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between the incidence of hypoglycemic symptoms and female sex, with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs).
resultsFemale sex was found to be significantly associated with hypoglycemic symptoms (female vs. male; OR 2.04; 95 % CI 1.22-3.41; p = 0.007). The concomitant use of other antihyperglycemic agents (≥2 vs. 0 concomitant drug; OR 2.80; 95 % CI 1.17-6.67; p = 0.021), a shorter duration of diabetes medication (<3 vs. ≥24 months; OR 4.14; 95 % CI 1.06-16.14; p = 0.041) and a longer follow-up period (OR 1.02; 95 % CI 1.00-1.04; p = 0.041) were identified as risk factors for hypoglycemia that were specific to females.
conclusionTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to focus on female sex as a potential risk factor for SU-associated hypoglycemia. Our results support the importance of individualized therapy, which may be effective not only for reducing the risk of hypoglycemia in females but also the risk of its consequences, such as cardiovascular disease, dementia and increased mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.