ArticleScientific reports2015
Social distance and anonymity modulate fairness consideration: An ERP study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effect of Losses Disguised as Wins and Near Misses in Electronic Gaming Machines: A Systematic Review.Journal of gambling studies · 2017Pooled it
- Are Deaf College Students More Sensitive to Unfair Information? Evidence from an ERP Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- The Effects of Cooperative and Competitive Situations on Statistical Learning.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Group Membership Modulates Fairness Consideration Among Deaf College Students-An Event-Related Potential Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The Effect of Task Difficulty and Self-Contribution on Fairness Consideration: An Event-Related Potential Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Electrophysiological Markers of Fairness and Selfishness Revealed by a Combination of Dictator and Ultimatum Games.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Article
- Social Interaction With an Anonymous Opponent Requires Increased Involvement of the Theory of Mind Neural System: An fMRI Study.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Immediate online use of prosody reveals the ironic intentions of a speaker: neurophysiological evidence.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
- Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials.Psychology research and behavior management · 2019Article
- Both Rewards and Moral Praise Can Increase the Prosocial Decisions: Revealed in a Modified Ultimatum Game Task.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Decisions for Others Are Less Risk-Averse in the Gain Frame and Less Risk-Seeking in the Loss Frame Than Decisions for the Self.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Diffusion of responsibility attenuates altruistic punishment: A functional magnetic resonance imaging effective connectivity study.Human brain mapping · 2016Article
- When Do Low Status Individuals Accept Less? The Interaction between Self- and Other-Status during Resource Distribution.Frontiers in psychology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research indicated that fairness consideration can be influenced by social distance. However, it is not clear whether social distance and anonymity have an interactive impact on fairness evaluation during asset distribution and whether these processes can be documented in brain activity. Using a modified ultimatum game combined with measures of event related potential (ERP), we examined how social distance and anonymity modulate brain response to inequality. At the behavior level, we found that acceptance rate and reaction time can be substantially modified by social distance and anonymity. Feedback-related negativity, an ERP component associated with conflict between cognitive and emotion motives, was more negative in response to unfairness than fairness from strangers; however, it showed an opposite trend for unfair offers provided by friends, suggesting that the influence of social distance on fairness perception is relatively fast. The P300 in response to fair offers was more positive when the proposers made offers when uncertain about partner identity than when certain about partner identity. These results suggest that unfairness is evaluated in a fast conflict detection stage and a slower stage that integrates more complex social contextual factors such as anonymity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.