ArticleBMC genomics2015
Deciphering common and specific transcriptional immune responses in pea towards the oomycete pathogens Aphanomyces euteiches and Phytophthora pisi.
Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating genomics, multi-omics, CRISPR and speed breeding for stress-resilient vegetable legume improvement.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Transcriptome analysis of sugar beet in response to the pathogenic oomycete Aphanomyces cochlioides.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Transcriptomic analysis identifies candidate genes for Aphanomyces root rot disease resistance in pea.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Identification of Novel Genes Associated with Partial Resistance to Aphanomyces Root Rot in Field Pea by BSR-Seq Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Transcriptomics Analysis of Wheat Tassel Response toFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Genomics Enabled Breeding Strategies for Major Biotic Stresses in Pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Characterization of field pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Transcriptome analysis of wheat spikes in response to Tilletia controversa Kühn which cause wheat dwarf bunt.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Transcriptome analysis of Actinidia chinensis in response to Botryosphaeria dothidea infection.PloS one · 2020Article
- Exchanges at the Plant-Oomycete Interface That Influence Disease.Plant physiology · 2019Review
- Transcriptome Analysis Reveals New Insights into the Bacterial Wilt Resistance Mechanism Mediated by Silicon in Tomato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Genomics of Plant Disease Resistance in Legumes.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Review
- Genomics analysis of Aphanomyces spp. identifies a new class of oomycete effector associated with host adaptation.BMC biology · 2018Article
- Transcription Profiling Analysis of Mango-Fusarium mangiferae Interaction.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoot rot caused by Aphanomyces euteiches is one of the most destructive pea diseases while a distantly related species P. pisi has been recently described as the agent of pea and faba bean root rot. These two oomycete pathogens with different pathogenicity factor repertories have both evolved specific mechanisms to infect pea. However, little is known about the genes and mechanisms of defence against these pathogens in pea. In the present study, the transcriptomic response of pea to these two pathogens was investigated at two time points during early phase of infection using a Medicago truncatula microarray.
resultsOf the 37,976 genes analysed, 574 and 817 were differentially expressed in response to A. euteiches at 6 hpi and 20 hpi, respectively, while 544 and 611 genes were differentially regulated against P. pisi at 6 hpi and 20 hpi, respectively. Differentially expressed genes associated with plant immunity responses were involved in cell wall reinforcement, hormonal signalling and phenylpropanoid metabolism. Activation of cell wall modification, regulation of jasmonic acid biosynthesis and induction of ethylene signalling pathway were among the common transcriptional responses to both of these oomycetes. However, induction of chalcone synthesis and the auxin pathway were specific transcriptional changes against A. euteiches.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate a global view of differentially expressed pea genes during compatible interactions with P. pisi and A. euteiches at an early phase of infection. The results suggest that distinct signalling pathways are triggered in pea by these two pathogens that lead to common and specific immune mechanisms in response to these two oomycetes. The generated knowledge may eventually be used in breeding pea varieties with resistance against root rot disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.