Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26293305›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2015

Coordinate post-transcriptional repression of Dpp-dependent transcription factors attenuates signal range during development.

Fay G Newton, Robin E Harris, Catherine Sutcliffe, Hilary L Ashe

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. RNA-binding is the essential biological function of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Muskelin acts as a substrate receptor of the highly regulatedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Novel roles for RNA binding proteins squid, hephaesteus, and Hrb27C in Drosophila oogenesis.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Ythdf mCell reports · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Shep regulatesDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Translational Control of Germ Cell Decisions.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. New Twists in Drosophila Cell Signaling.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fay G NewtonFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Robin E HarrisFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Catherine SutcliffeFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Hilary L AsheFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK hilary.ashe@manchester.ac.uk.
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J005746/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise control of the range of signalling molecule action is crucial for correct cell fate patterning during development. For example, Drosophila ovarian germline stem cells (GSCs) are maintained by exquisitely short-range BMP signalling from the niche. In the absence of BMP signalling, one GSC daughter differentiates into a cystoblast (CB) and this fate is stabilised by Brain tumour (Brat) and Pumilio (Pum)-mediated post-transcriptional repression of mRNAs, including that encoding the Dpp transducer, Mad. However, the identity of other repressed mRNAs and the mechanism of post-transcriptional repression are currently unknown. Here, we identify the Medea and schnurri mRNAs, which encode transcriptional regulators required for activation and/or repression of Dpp target genes, as additional Pum-Brat targets, suggesting that tripartite repression of the transducers is deployed to desensitise the CB to Dpp. In addition, we show that repression by Pum-Brat requires recruitment of the CCR4 and Pop2 deadenylases, with knockdown of deadenylases in vivo giving rise to ectopic GSCs. Consistent with this, Pum-Brat repression leads to poly(A) tail shortening and mRNA degradation in tissue culture cells, and we detect a reduced number of Mad and shn transcripts in the CB relative to the GSC based on single molecule mRNA quantitation. Finally, we show generality of the mechanism by demonstrating that Brat also attenuates pMad and Dpp signalling range in the early embryo. Together our data serve as a platform for understanding how post-transcriptional repression restricts interpretation of BMPs and other cell signals in order to allow robust cell fate patterning during development.

Indexed as

Adult Stem CellsAnimalsBlotting, WesternCell DifferentiationDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalIn Situ HybridizationOvarySmad4 ProteinTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsMAD protein, DrosophilaMed protein, Drosophilashn protein, DrosophilaSmad4 ProteinTranscription FactorsBMPBratDifferentiationMadMedeaPost-transcriptional repressionPumSchnurri

Identifiers

PMID26293305
PMCPMC4631754
OpenAlexW2253124357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.