Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26292988›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of clinical practice2015

Integrative review on the non-invasive management of lower urinary tract symptoms in men following treatments for pelvic malignancies.

S Faithfull, A Lemanska, P Aslet, N Bhatt, J Coe, L Drudge-Coates, M Feneley, R Glynn-Jones, M Kirby, S Langley and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of clinical practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

S FaithfullSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Stag Hill, Guildford, UK.
A LemanskaSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Stag Hill, Guildford, UK.
P AsletDepartment of Urology, Hampshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.
N BhattSutton & Merton Community Services, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J CoeUniversity College Hospital, London, UK.
L Drudge-CoatesKing's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
M FeneleyUniversity College Hospital, London, UK.
R Glynn-JonesMount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, UK.
M KirbyFaculty of Health & Human Sciences, Centre for Research in Primary & Community Care (CRIPACC), University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK.
S LangleyThe Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.
T McNicholasLister Hospital, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK.
J NewmanOxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK.
C C SmithSchool of Health and Social Care, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK.
A SahaiGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's Health Partners, London, UK.
E TruemanLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
H PayneUniversity College Hospital, London, UK.
University College London · GBUniversity of Surrey · GBBournemouth University · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College Hospital · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBLister Hospital · GBMount Vernon Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo develop a non-invasive management strategy for men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after treatment for pelvic cancer, that is suitable for use in a primary healthcare context.

methodsPubMed literature searches of LUTS management in this patient group were carried out, together with obtaining a consensus of management strategies from a panel of authors for the management of LUTS from across the UK.

resultsData from 41 articles were investigated and collated. Clinical experience was sought from authors where there was no clinical evidence. The findings discussed in this paper confirm that LUTS after the cancer treatment can significantly impair men's quality of life. While many men recover from LUTS spontaneously over time, a significant proportion require long-term management. Despite the prevalence of LUTS, there is a lack of consensus on best management. This article offers a comprehensive treatment algorithm to manage patients with LUTS following pelvic cancer treatment.

conclusionBased on published research literature and clinical experience, recommendations are proposed for the standardisation of management strategies employed for men with LUTS after the pelvic cancer treatment. In addition to implementing the algorithm, understanding the rationale for the type and timing of LUTS management strategies is crucial for clinicians and patients.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAlgorithmsHumansLower Urinary Tract SymptomsPelvic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26292988
PMCPMC5042099
OpenAlexW1546756547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.