ArticleBMC family practice2015
Implementation of integrated care for diabetes mellitus type 2 by two Dutch care groups: a case study.
Article in BMC family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Integrating Self-Management Education and Support in Routine Care of People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Conceptional Model Based on Critical Interpretive Synthesis and A Consensus-Building Participatory Consultation.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2022Pooled it
- Strategic development of integrated governance for type 2 diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) care in Indonesia: a mixed-methods approach.Global health action · 2026Article
- Logic Models on Health Information Technology-Related Interventions: Scoping Review Across Disciplines.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Implementing a community specialist team to support the delivery of integrated diabetes care: experiences in Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic.HRB open research · 2023Article
- Integrating Primary and Secondary Care to Enhance Chronic Disease Management: A Scoping Review.International journal of integrated care · 2021Article
- The Barriers and Facilitators of Self-Management Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Trans Theoretical Model (TTM)-Based Mixed Method Study in Iran.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2020Article
- 'Sink or Swim': A Qualitative Study to Understand How and Why Nurses Adapt to Support the Implementation of Integrated Diabetes Care.International journal of integrated care · 2019Article
- Project INTEGRATE: Developing a Framework to Guide Design, Implementation and Evaluation of People-centred Integrated Care Processes.International journal of integrated care · 2019Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Workforce Changes in Integrated Care.International journal of integrated care · 2018Article
- Article
- The Development, Description and Appraisal of an Emergent Multimethod Research Design to Study Workforce Changes in Integrated Care Interventions.International journal of integrated care · 2017Article
- Implementation of integrated geriatric care at a German hospital: a case study to understand when and why beneficial outcomes can be achieved.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Exploration of workforce changes in integrated chronic care: Findings from an interactive and emergent research design.PloS one · 2017Review
- Cooperation Improvement in an Integrated Healthcare Network: A Social Network Analysis.International journal of integrated careArticle
- Article
- Adoption and Initial Implementation of a National Integrated Care Programme for Diabetes: A Realist Evaluation.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEven though previous research has demonstrated improved outcomes of integrated care initiatives, it is not clear why and when integrated care works. This study aims to contribute to filling this knowledge gap by examining the implementation of integrated care for type 2 diabetes by two Dutch care groups.
methodsAn embedded single case study was conducted including 26 interviews with management staff, care purchasers and health professionals. The Context + Mechanism = Outcome Model was used to study the relationship between context factors, mechanisms and outcomes. Dutch integrated care involves care groups, bundled payments, patient involvement, health professional cooperation and task substitution, evidence-based care protocols and a shared clinical information system. Community involvement is not (yet) part of Dutch integrated care.
resultsBarriers to the implementation of integrated care included insufficient integration between the patient databases, decreased earnings for some health professionals, patients' insufficient medical and policy-making expertise, resistance by general practitioner assistants due to perceived competition, too much care provided by practice nurses instead of general practitioners and the funding system incentivising the provision of care exactly as described in the care protocols. Facilitators included performance monitoring via the care chain information system, increased earnings for some health professionals, increased focus on self-management, innovators in primary and secondary care, diabetes nurses acting as integrators and financial incentives for guideline adherence. Economic and political context and health IT-related barriers were discussed as the most problematic areas of integrated care implementation. The implementation of integrated care led to improved communication and cooperation but also to insufficient and unnecessary care provision and deteriorated preconditions for person-centred care.
conclusionsDutch integrated diabetes care is still a work in progress, in the academic and the practice setting. This makes it difficult to establish whether overall quality of care has improved. Future efforts should focus on areas that this study found to be problematic or to not have received enough attention yet. Increased efforts are needed to improve the interoperability of the patient databases and to keep the negative consequences of the bundled payment system in check. Moreover, patient and community involvement should be incorporated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.