Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26292696›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2015

Assessing Transplant Education Practices in Dialysis Centers: Comparing Educator Reported and Medicare Data.

Amy D Waterman, John D Peipert, Christina J Goalby, Katrina M Dinkel, Huiling Xiao, Krista L Lentine

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Your Path to Transplant: A randomized controlled trial of a tailored expert system intervention to increase knowledge, attitudes, and pursuit of kidney transplant.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Effect of the iChoose Kidney decision aid in improving knowledge about treatment options among transplant candidates: A randomized controlled trial.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2018
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Dialysis facility referral and start of evaluation for kidney transplantation among patients treated with dialysis in the Southeastern United States.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy D WatermanDivision of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; awaterman@mednet.ucla.edu.
John D PeipertDivision of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri;
Christina J GoalbyDivision of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri;
Katrina M DinkelHeartland Kidney Network, Kansas City, Missouri; and.
Huiling XiaoCenter for Outcomes Research and Abdominal Transplantation Center, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Krista L LentineCenter for Outcomes Research and Abdominal Transplantation Center, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1-TR000124OSTLTS CDC HHS R39-OT10582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires that dialysis centers inform new patients of their transplant options and document compliance using the CMS-2728 Medical Evidence Form (Form-2728). This study compared reports of transplant education for new dialysis patients reported to CMS with descriptions from transplant educators (predominantly dialysis nurses and social workers) of their centers' quantity of and specific educational practices. The goal was to determine what specific transplant education occurred and whether provision of transplant education was associated with center-level variation in transplant wait-listing rates. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Form-2728 data were drawn for 1558 incident dialysis patients at 170 centers in the Heartland Kidney Network (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska) in 2009-2011; educators at these centers completed a survey describing their transplant educational practices. Educators' own survey responses were compared with Form-2728 reports for patients at each corresponding center. The association of quantity of transplant education practices used with wait-listing rates across dialysis centers was examined using multivariable negative binomial regression.

resultsAccording to Form-2728, 77% of patients (n=1203) were informed of their transplant options within 45 days. Educators, who reported low levels of transplant knowledge themselves (six of 12 questions answered correctly), most commonly reported giving oral recommendations to begin transplant evaluation (988 informed patients educated, 81% of centers) and referrals to external transplant education programs (959 informed patients educated, 81% of centers). Only 18% reported having detailed discussions about transplant with their patients. Compared with others, centers that used more than three educational activities (incident rate ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.73) had higher transplant wait-listing rates.

conclusionsWhile most educators inform new patients that transplant is an option, dialysis centers with higher wait-listing rates use multiple transplant education strategies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIowaKansasKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMaleMandatory ReportingMedicareMiddle AgedMissouriNebraskadialysisethnicitykidney transplantationTransplant education practicesWait-listing

Identifiers

PMID26292696
PMCPMC4559519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.