ArticleImplementation science : IS2015
Understanding effective care management implementation in primary care: a macrocognition perspective analysis.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Measures of fidelity of delivery of, and engagement with, complex, face-to-face health behaviour change interventions: A systematic review of measure quality.British journal of health psychology · 2017Pooled it
- Diabetic and Obese Patient Clinical Outcomes Improve During a Care Management Implementation in Primary Care.Journal of primary care & community health · 2017 · on this mapTrial
- Navigating qualitative methods choices in dissemination and implementation research.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Connecting pathogen transmission and healthcare worker cognition: a cognitive task analysis of infection prevention and control practices during simulated patient care.BMJ quality & safety · 2024Article
- Beyond the Individual: A Multidisciplinary Model for Critical Thinking in the Intensive Care Unit.Advances in medical education and practice · 2024Article
- Understanding Clinician Macrocognition to Inform the Design of a Congenital Heart Disease Clinical Decision Support System.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Lived Experiences of Diabetes Team and Patients about Diabetes Care System after Redesigning Delivery System and Supporting Self-Management in Iran: A Qualitative Research.International journal of preventive medicine · 2022Article
- The CMS State Innovation Models Initiative and Improved Health Information Technology and Care Management Capabilities of Physician Practices.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2021Article
- Cancer Center Clinic and Research Team Perceptions of Identity and Interactions.Journal of oncology practice · 2017Article
- A Comparison of Health Plan- and Provider-Delivered Chronic Care Management Models on Patient Clinical Outcomes.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Article
- Macrocognition: From Theory to Toolbox.Frontiers in psychology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCare management in primary care can be effective in helping patients with chronic disease improve their health status. Primary care practices, however, are often challenged with its implementation. Incorporating care management involves more than a simple physical process redesign to existing clinical care routines. It involves changes to who is working with patients, and consequently such things as who is making decisions, who is sharing patient information, and how. Studying the range of such changes in "knowledge work" during implementation requires a perspective and tools designed to do so. We used the macrocognition perspective, which is designed to understand how individuals think in dynamic, messy real-world environments such as care management implementation. To do so, we used cognitive task analysis to understand implementation in terms of such thinking as decision making, knowledge, and communication.
methodsData collection involved semi-structured interviews and observations at baseline and at approximately 9 months into implementation at five practices in one physician-owned administratively connected group of practices in the state of Michigan, USA. Practices were intervention participants in a larger trial of chronic care model implementation. Data were transcribed, qualitatively coded and analyzed, initially using an editing approach and then a template approach with macrocognition as a guiding framework.
resultsSeventy-four interviews and five observations were completed. There were differences in implementation success across the practices, and these differences in implementation success were well explained by macrocognition. Practices that used more macrocognition functions and used them more often were also more successful in care management implementation.
conclusionsAlthough care management can introduce many new changes into the delivery of primary care clinical practice, implementing it successfully as a new complex intervention is possible. Macrocognition is a useful perspective for illuminating the elements that facilitate new complex interventions with a view to addressing them during implementation planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.