Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26292670›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2015

Understanding effective care management implementation in primary care: a macrocognition perspective analysis.

Jodi Summers Holtrop, Georges Potworowski, Laurie Fitzpatrick, Amy Kowalk, Lee A Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Macrocognition: From Theory to Toolbox.Frontiers in psychology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jodi Summers HoltropDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, 12631 E 17th Avenue, Mail Stop F496, Room 3505 Academic Office 1, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Jodi.holtrop@ucdenver.edu.
Georges PotworowskiDepartment of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.
Laurie FitzpatrickDepartment of Family Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Amy KowalkPriority Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Lee A GreenDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)UL1TR000433 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$49.9M
Implementing Sustainable Diabetes Prevention and Self-Management in Primary CareR18DK082377 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HOLTROP, JODI SUMMERS · 2010 to 2013
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000433NIDDK NIH HHS 1 R18 DK082377-01A2NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK082377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare management in primary care can be effective in helping patients with chronic disease improve their health status. Primary care practices, however, are often challenged with its implementation. Incorporating care management involves more than a simple physical process redesign to existing clinical care routines. It involves changes to who is working with patients, and consequently such things as who is making decisions, who is sharing patient information, and how. Studying the range of such changes in "knowledge work" during implementation requires a perspective and tools designed to do so. We used the macrocognition perspective, which is designed to understand how individuals think in dynamic, messy real-world environments such as care management implementation. To do so, we used cognitive task analysis to understand implementation in terms of such thinking as decision making, knowledge, and communication.

methodsData collection involved semi-structured interviews and observations at baseline and at approximately 9 months into implementation at five practices in one physician-owned administratively connected group of practices in the state of Michigan, USA. Practices were intervention participants in a larger trial of chronic care model implementation. Data were transcribed, qualitatively coded and analyzed, initially using an editing approach and then a template approach with macrocognition as a guiding framework.

resultsSeventy-four interviews and five observations were completed. There were differences in implementation success across the practices, and these differences in implementation success were well explained by macrocognition. Practices that used more macrocognition functions and used them more often were also more successful in care management implementation.

conclusionsAlthough care management can introduce many new changes into the delivery of primary care clinical practice, implementing it successfully as a new complex intervention is possible. Macrocognition is a useful perspective for illuminating the elements that facilitate new complex interventions with a view to addressing them during implementation planning.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingCognitionHumansInterviews as TopicPrimary Health CareProgram Development

Identifiers

PMID26292670
PMCPMC4545994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.