Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26292666›Full record

SynthesisCurrent gastroenterology reports2015

Meta-Analysis-Based Guidance for Dietary Management in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Alfredo J Lucendo

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current gastroenterology reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Molecular Mechanisms of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Eosinophilic esophagitis: early diagnosis is the key.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alfredo J LucendoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, Vereda de Socuéllamos, s/n., 13700, Tomelloso, Ciudad Real, Spain, alucendo@vodafone.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a prevalent chronic esophageal disorder, triggered and maintained by immunologically mediated responses against dietary antigens. EoE represents the most recent form of food allergy, and its control by avoiding offending foods has increasingly appeared as a therapeutic alternative to achieve and maintain remission. Dietary therapies have proved equally effective in pediatric and adult EoE patients, among whom various types of interventions to eliminate or reduce food antigens exposure have been evaluated. A recent meta-analysis showed elemental diet as the most effective option to induce disease remission, but with a limited application in clinical practice. Inconsistency and wide variability in results from skin allergy testing-directed food restriction contributed to dissatisfaction with implementation of this option, which subsequently was displaced by empiric elimination of common food allergens. Such empiric elimination of common food allergens is now recognized as the best alternative for dietary treatment, with moderate-to-high efficiency and reproducible results. This review provides evidence-based insights into the dietary management of EoE.

Indexed as

Eosinophilic EsophagitisFood, FormulatedFood HypersensitivityHumansImmunoglobulin ESkin TestsImmunoglobulin E

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.