Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26292189›Full record

ArticleBehavioural pharmacology2016

Cocaine-induced reward enhancement measured with intracranial self-stimulation in rats bred for low versus high saccharin intake.

Anna K Radke, Natalie E Zlebnik, Nathan A Holtz, Marilyn E Carroll

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna K RadkeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Natalie E Zlebnik
Nathan A Holtz
Marilyn E Carroll
University of Minnesota · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING OF NEUROSCIENTISTST32GM008471 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI EBNER, TIMOTHY J · 1993 to 2017
$4.9M
Vulnerability to Drug Abuse: Experimental InterventionsR01DA003240 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CARROLL, MARILYN E. · 1985 to 2010
$3.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA003240NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA003240-28NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rats selectively bred for high (HiS) or low (LoS) saccharin intake are a well-established model of drug-abuse vulnerability, with HiS rats being more likely to consume sweets and cocaine than LoS rats. Still, the nature of these differences is poorly understood. This study examined whether the motivational consequences of cocaine exposure are differentially expressed in HiS and LoS rats by measuring intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) thresholds following acute injections of cocaine (10 mg/kg). Reductions in ICSS thresholds following cocaine injection were greater in HiS rats than in LoS rats, suggesting that the reward-enhancing effects of cocaine are greater in the drug-vulnerable HiS than LoS rats. Higher cocaine-induced reward, indicated by lower ICSS thresholds, may explain the higher rates of drug consumption in sweet-preferring animal models, providing a clue to the etiology of cocaine addiction in vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

RewardSelf StimulationAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsCocaineDisease Models, AnimalDopamine Uptake InhibitorsElectric StimulationFood PreferencesMaleRatsSaccharinSubstance-Related DisordersSweetening AgentsCocaineDopamine Uptake InhibitorsSaccharinSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID26292189
PMCPMC4760907
OpenAlexW2334516126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.