Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26292100›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2015

Prognostic value of (18) F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside PET/CT in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Tsuneo Saga, Masayuki Inubushi, Mitsuru Koizumi, Kyosan Yoshikawa, Ming-Rong Zhang, Katsuyuki Tanimoto, Atsushi Horiike, Noriko Yanagitani, Fumiyoshi Ohyanagi, Makoto Nishio

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Hypoxia-specific imaging in patients with lymphoma undergoing CAR-T therapy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. [Molecular imaging and biology · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Hypoxia imaging withRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2018
    Article
  17. Oxygen Sensing, Hypoxia Tracing andFrontiers in chemistry · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tsuneo SagaMolecular Imaging Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.
Masayuki InubushiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
Mitsuru KoizumiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyosan YoshikawaResearch Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.
Ming-Rong ZhangMolecular Imaging Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.
Katsuyuki TanimotoResearch Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.
Atsushi HoriikeDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko YanagitaniDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumiyoshi OhyanagiDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto NishioDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPKawasaki Medical School · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the prognostic value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using (18) F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside (FAZA) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Thirty-eight patients with advanced NSCLC (stage III, 23 patients; stage IV, 15 patients) underwent FAZA and FDG PET/CT before treatment. The PET parameters (tumor-to-muscle ratio [T/M] at 1 and 2 h for FAZA, maximum standardized uptake value for FDG) in the primary lesion and lymph node (LN) metastasis and clinical parameters were compared concerning their effects on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In our univariate analysis of all patients, clinical stage and FAZA T/M in LNs at 1 and 2 h were predictive of PFS (P = 0.021, 0.028, and 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analysis also indicated that clinical stage and FAZA T/M in LNs at 1 and 2 h were independent predictors of PFS. Subgroup analysis of chemoradiotherapy-treated stage III patients revealed that only FAZA T/M in LNs at 2 h was predictive of PFS (P = 0.025). The FDG PET/CT parameters were not predictive of PFS. No parameter was a significant predictor of OS. In patients with advanced NSCLC, FAZA uptake in LNs, but not in primary lesions, was predictive of treatment outcome. These results suggest the importance of characterization of LN metastases in advanced NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

NitroimidazolesRadiopharmaceuticalsAdultAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisfluoroazomycin arabinosideFluorodeoxyglucose F18NitroimidazolesRadiopharmaceuticals18F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside (FAZA)18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)non-small-cell lung cancerpositron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)prognosis

Identifiers

PMID26292100
PMCPMC4714693
OpenAlexW1936024240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.