Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26292061›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2015

Using Social Network Analysis to Assess Mentorship and Collaboration in a Public Health Network.

Miruna Petrescu-Prahova, Basia Belza, Katherine Leith, Peg Allen, Norma B Coe, Lynda A Anderson

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Miruna Petrescu-PrahovaSchool of Public Health, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th St, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98105. Email: mirunapp@uw.edu.
Basia BelzaUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Katherine LeithUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Peg AllenWashington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Norma B CoeUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Lynda A AndersonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
University of Washington · USEmory University · USUniversity of South Carolina · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

HEALTH PROMOTION RESEARCH CENTERU48DP001911 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI AU, DAVID H, HARRIS, JEFFREY RANDALL · 2009 to 2013
$14.3M
HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTERS: CENTER PROPOSAL CAT. 1U48DP001936 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI WILCOX, SARA · 2009 to 2013
$7.3M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001911NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48-DP-001911NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001936NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48-DP-001936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAddressing chronic disease burden requires the creation of collaborative networks to promote systemic changes and engage stakeholders. Although many such networks exist, they are rarely assessed with tools that account for their complexity. This study examined the structure of mentorship and collaboration relationships among members of the Healthy Aging Research Network (HAN) using social network analysis (SNA).

methodsWe invited 97 HAN members and partners to complete an online social network survey that included closed-ended questions about HAN-specific mentorship and collaboration during the previous 12 months. Collaboration was measured by examining the activity of the network on 6 types of products: published articles, in-progress manuscripts, grant applications, tools, research projects, and presentations. We computed network-level measures such as density, number of components, and centralization to assess the cohesiveness of the network.

resultsSixty-three respondents completed the survey (response rate, 65%). Responses, which included information about collaboration with nonrespondents, suggested that 74% of HAN members were connected through mentorship ties and that all 97 members were connected through at least one form of collaboration. Mentorship and collaboration ties were present both within and across boundaries of HAN member organizations.

conclusionSNA of public health collaborative networks provides understanding about the structure of relationships that are formed as a result of participation in network activities. This approach may offer members and funders a way to assess the impact of such networks that goes beyond simply measuring products and participation at the individual level.

Indexed as

AgingInterinstitutional RelationsMentorsSocial NetworkingCapacity BuildingCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Chronic DiseaseCooperative BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionHealth Planning SupportHealth Services for the AgedHealth Services ResearchHumansInformation DisseminationInterdisciplinary Communication

Identifiers

PMID26292061
PMCPMC4565512
OpenAlexW2095748282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.