Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26292040›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2016

Improved 5-Factor Prognostic Classification of Patients Receiving Salvage Systemic Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

Guru Sonpavde, Gregory R Pond, Jonathan E Rosenberg, Dean F Bajorin, Toni K Choueiri, Andrea Necchi, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo, Joaquim Bellmunt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. [American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Guru SonpavdeUniversity of Alabama-Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama. Electronic address: gsonpavde@uabmc.edu.
Gregory R PondMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan E RosenbergMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Dean F BajorinMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Toni K ChoueiriDana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrea NecchiFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe Di LorenzoUniversity Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Joaquim BellmuntDana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USFederico II University Hospital · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrognostic factors in patients receiving salvage systemic therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma include performance status, liver metastasis, hemoglobin and time since chemotherapy. We investigated the impact of albumin, and neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet counts. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatient level data from 10 phase II trials were used. Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to evaluate associations with overall survival. An optimal regression model was constructed using forward stepwise selection and risk groups were defined using the number of adverse factors. Trial was a stratification factor. External validation was done in a separate data set of 5 salvage phase II trials.

resultsDiscovery data were obtained on 708 patients. After adjustment for the 4 known factors a platelet count of the upper limit of normal or greater and albumin less than the lower limit of normal were significant poor prognostic factors. Only the addition of albumin was externally validated. For 0 or 1, 2 and 3 or greater risk factors median overall survival was 8.9, 6.4 and 4.5 months in 207, 171 and 113 patients in the discovery data set of 491, and 10.6, 10.0 and 7.0 months in 73, 47 and 47 patients, respectively, in the validation data set of 167. By adding albumin the c-index improved from 0.610 to 0.639 in the discovery set and from 0.616 to 0.646 in the validation set.

conclusionsAlbumin was externally validated as a prognostic factor for overall survival after accounting for time from prior chemotherapy, hemoglobin, performance status and liver metastasis status in patients receiving salvage systemic therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. The discovery of molecular prognostic factors is a priority to further enhance this new preferred 5-factor clinical prognostic model.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBlood Cell CountCarcinoma, Transitional CellClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSalvage TherapySerum AlbuminSurvival AnalysisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorSerum Albuminalbuminscarcinomaprognosisurinary tracturothelium

Identifiers

PMID26292040
PMCPMC5025874
OpenAlexW1185980600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.