Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26291916›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2015

Innovative methods for parents and clinics to create tools for kids' care (IMPACCT Kids' Care) study protocol.

Heather Angier, Miguel Marino, Aleksandra Sumic, Jean O'Malley, Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman, Megan Hoopes, Christine Nelson, Rachel Gold, Deborah Cohen, Kristin Dickerson and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02298361 (Innovative Methods for Parents And Clinics to Create Tools), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02298361 completednot on this map

Innovative Methods for Parents And Clinics to Create Tools (IMPACCT) for Kids' Care

TypeobservationalSponsorOCHIN, Inc.Ran2013 to 2016Enrolled27,251ConditionsInsurance Status/StabilityArmsHealth insurance outreach IT tools
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Innovative Implementation Studies Conducted in US Safety Net Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Heather AngierOregon Health & Science University, USA. Electronic address: angierh@ohsu.edu.
Miguel MarinoOregon Health & Science University, USA.
Aleksandra SumicOCHIN, Inc., USA.
Jean O'MalleyOregon Health & Science University, USA.
Sonja Likumahuwa-AckmanOregon Health & Science University, USA.
Megan HoopesOCHIN, Inc., USA.
Christine NelsonOCHIN, Inc., USA.
Rachel GoldOCHIN, Inc., USA; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, USA.
Deborah CohenOregon Health & Science University, USA.
Kristin DickersonOCHIN, Inc., USA.
Jennifer E DeVoeOregon Health & Science University, USA; OCHIN, Inc., USA.

Funding

Community-based HIT Tools for Cancer Screening and Health Insurance PromotionR01CA181452 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite expansions in public health insurance, many children remain uninsured or experience gaps in coverage. Community health centers (CHCs) provide primary care to many children at risk for uninsurance and are well-positioned to help families obtain and retain children's coverage. Recent advances in health information technology (HIT) capabilities provide the means to create tools that could enhance CHCs' insurance outreach efforts.

objectiveTo present the study design, baseline patient characteristics, variables, and statistical methods for the Innovative Methods for Parents And Clinics to Create Tools for Kids' Care (IMPACCT Kids' Care) study. METHODS/

designIn this mixed methods study, we will design, test and refine health insurance outreach HIT tools through a user-centered process. We will then implement the tools in four CHCs and evaluate their effectiveness and barriers and facilitators to their implementation. To measure effectiveness, we will quantitatively assess health insurance coverage continuity and utilization of healthcare services for pediatric patients in intervention CHCs compared to matched control sites using electronic health record (EHR) and Oregon Medicaid administrative data over 18months pre- and 18months post-implementation (n=34,867 children). We will also qualitatively assess the implementation process to understand how the tools fit into the clinics' workflows and the CHC staff experiences with the tools.

conclusionsThis study creates, implements, and evaluates health insurance outreach HIT tools. The use of such tools will likely improve care delivery and health outcomes, reduce healthcare disparities for vulnerable populations, and enhance overall healthcare system performance. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02298361.

Indexed as

Access to healthcareChildrenCommunity health centersHealth insurance

Identifiers

PMID26291916
PMCPMC4757508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.