Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26291768›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2015

Docetaxel Alone or in Combination With a Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine (PANVAC) in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Christopher R Heery, Nuhad K Ibrahim, Philip M Arlen, Mahsa Mohebtash, James L Murray, Kimberly Koenig, Ravi A Madan, Sheri McMahon, Jennifer L Marté, Seth M Steinberg and 7 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00179309 (A Randomized Pilot Phase II Study of Docetaxel Alone or in Combination With PANVAC), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00179309 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized Pilot Phase II Study of Docetaxel Alone or in Combination With PANVAC(Trademark)-V (Vaccinia) and PANVAC(Trademark)-F (Fowlpox) in Adults With Metastatic Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2005 to 2013Enrolled48ConditionsBreast CancerArmsDocetaxel, PANVAC-V, PANVAC-F, Sargramostim
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Overcoming Drug Resistance by Paclitaxel Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer: Beyond Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Current and future immunotherapy for breast cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Therapeutic cancer vaccines: advancements, challenges, and prospects.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher R HeeryLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Nuhad K IbrahimDivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Philip M ArlenLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mahsa MohebtashLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
James L MurrayDivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Kimberly KoenigDivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Ravi A MadanGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sheri McMahonGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jennifer L MartéGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Seth M SteinbergBiostatistics and Data Management Section, Office of the Clinical Director, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Renee N DonahueLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Italia GrengaLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Caroline JochemsLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Benedetto FarsaciLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Les R FolioRadiology and Imaging Services, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jeffrey SchlomLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
James L GulleyGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Cancer Institute · USCenter for Cancer Research · USNational Institutes of Health · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USOffice of the Director · US

Funding

Human T Cell Responses to Tumor Antigens for Cancer Vaccine DevelopmentZIABC010598 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHLOM, JEFFREY · 2009 to 2025
$19.3M
Strategies for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine Clinical TrialsZIABC010425 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHLOM, JEFFREY · 2009 to 2023
$13.7M
Cancer Immunotherapy Clinical TrialsZIABC011547 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI STRAUSS, JULIUS · 2014 to 2023
$8.1M
Clinical trials employing cancer vaccine combination therapiesZ01BC010945 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GULLEY, JAMES L. · 2008 to 2008
$517k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010945Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePrevious phase 1 and 2 trials of PANVAC, a poxviral-based cancer vaccine, have suggested clinical efficacy in some patients with breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer and have shown evidence of immunologic activity. Preclinical data have shown that docetaxel can modify tumor phenotype, making tumor cells more amenable to T cell-mediated killing.

objectiveThe goal of this study was to determine if the treatment combination of docetaxel and PANVAC improves clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer compared with docetaxel treatment alone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsBetween May 2006 and February 2012, this open-label, phase 2 randomized clinical trial enrolled 48 patients with metastatic breast cancer of all subtypes, without limitation on other lines of previous therapy, to receive treatment with either docetaxel with PANVAC (arm A) or docetaxel alone (arm B). Final clinical data were collected on September 16, 2013. All patients were treated at either the National Cancer Institute or the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), using a phase 2.5 statistical design, with the intent of identifying a trend toward benefit (defined as 1-sided P≤.10) to guide a larger trial design. Secondary end points included safety and immunologic correlative studies.

resultsForty-eight participants were enrolled: 25 were randomized to the combination treatment arm A, and 23 to arm B. No patient remained in the study at the time of the final analysis. Patient and tumor characteristics were well matched. Analysis of adverse events in both treatment arms demonstrated very little difference between the 2 groups. In the combination treatment arm (arm A), statistically significant increases were noted in the frequency of grades 1 and 2 edema (P=.02, likely related to greater median number of docetaxel cycles) and injection-site reactions (P<.001). In the final data analysis, median PFS was 7.9 months in arm A vs 3.9 months in arm B (hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.34-1.14]; P=.09). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results suggest that the combination of PANVAC with docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer may provide a clinical benefit. This study was hypothesis generating and provides both rationale and statistical assumptions for a larger definitive randomized study.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00179309.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMarylandMembrane GlycoproteinsMiddle AgedNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Neoplasm MetastasisProportional Hazards ModelsAntineoplastic AgentsCancer VaccinesDocetaxelMembrane GlycoproteinsPanvac-VFTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID26291768
PMCPMC6622177
OpenAlexW1650055942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.