Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26291767›Full record

ReviewConnective tissue research2015

The role of EMT and MET in cancer dissemination.

Jacqueline Banyard, Diane R Bielenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Connective tissue research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Effects of NaCell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacqueline Banyarda Vascular Biology Program, Department of Surgery , Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA.
Diane R Bielenberga Vascular Biology Program, Department of Surgery , Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA.

Funding

Semaphorin 3F: Structure, Function, and Anti-Metastatic ActivityK01CA118732 · NCI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI BIELENBERG, DIANE RENEE · 2006 to 2010
$774k
Targeting Neuropilin 2 with Semaphorin 3F during Pancreatic Carcinoma ProgressionR21CA155728 · NCI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI BIELENBERG, DIANE RENEE · 2011 to 2012
$416k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA118732NCI NIH HHS K01CA118732NCI NIH HHS P50CA09381NCI NIH HHS R21 CA155728NCI NIH HHS R21CA155728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic cancer cells are lethal. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that bolster the conversion from benign to malignant progression is key for treating these heterogeneous and resistant neoplasms. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a conserved cellular program that alters cell shape, adhesion and movement. The shift to a more mesenchymal-like phenotype can promote tumor cell intravasation of surrounding blood vessels and emigration to a new organ, yet may not be necessary for extravasation or colonization into that environment. Lymphatic dissemination, on the other hand, may not require EMT. This review presents emerging data on the modes by which tumor cells promote EMT/MET via microRNA and prepare the pre-metastatic niche via exosomes.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAnimalsCell DifferentiationDisease ProgressionEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHumansNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsEpithelial-mesenchymal transitionexosomeshematogenous metastasislymphaticslymphogenous metastasismicroRNA

Identifiers

PMID26291767
PMCPMC4780319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.