Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26291458›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Functional Divergence in the Role of N-Linked Glycosylation in Smoothened Signaling.

Suresh Marada, Gemma Navarro, Ashley Truong, Daniel P Stewart, Angela M Arensdorf, Sigrid Nachtergaele, Edgar Angelats, Joseph T Opferman, Rajat Rohatgi, Peter J McCormick and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fully activated structure of the sterol-bound Smoothened GPCR-Gi protein complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Suresh MaradaDepartment of Cell & Molecular Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Gemma NavarroDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED)University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ashley TruongDepartment of Cell & Molecular Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America; Summer Plus Program, Rhodes College, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Daniel P StewartDepartment of Cell & Molecular Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Angela M ArensdorfDepartment of Cell & Molecular Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Sigrid NachtergaeleDepartments of Medicine and Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Edgar AngelatsDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED)University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Joseph T OpfermanDepartment of Cell & Molecular Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Rajat RohatgiDepartments of Medicine and Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Peter J McCormickDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED)University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Stacey K OgdenDepartment of Cell & Molecular Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USStanford University · USUniversitat de Barcelona · ESBiomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases · ES

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Dissecting the Signaling Mechanisms of SmoothenedR01GM101087 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI OGDEN, STACEY KATHRYN · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Signal Transduction by OxysterolsR01GM106078 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI COVEY, DOUGLAS F, ROHATGI, RAJAT · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS 5P30CA021765NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM101087NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101087NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) Smoothened (Smo) is the requisite signal transducer of the evolutionarily conserved Hedgehog (Hh) pathway. Although aspects of Smo signaling are conserved from Drosophila to vertebrates, significant differences have evolved. These include changes in its active sub-cellular localization, and the ability of vertebrate Smo to induce distinct G protein-dependent and independent signals in response to ligand. Whereas the canonical Smo signal to Gli transcriptional effectors occurs in a G protein-independent manner, its non-canonical signal employs Gαi. Whether vertebrate Smo can selectively bias its signal between these routes is not yet known. N-linked glycosylation is a post-translational modification that can influence GPCR trafficking, ligand responsiveness and signal output. Smo proteins in Drosophila and vertebrate systems harbor N-linked glycans, but their role in Smo signaling has not been established. Herein, we present a comprehensive analysis of Drosophila and murine Smo glycosylation that supports a functional divergence in the contribution of N-linked glycans to signaling. Of the seven predicted glycan acceptor sites in Drosophila Smo, one is essential. Loss of N-glycosylation at this site disrupted Smo trafficking and attenuated its signaling capability. In stark contrast, we found that all four predicted N-glycosylation sites on murine Smo were dispensable for proper trafficking, agonist binding and canonical signal induction. However, the under-glycosylated protein was compromised in its ability to induce a non-canonical signal through Gαi, providing for the first time evidence that Smo can bias its signal and that a post-translational modification can impact this process. As such, we postulate a profound shift in N-glycan function from affecting Smo ER exit in flies to influencing its signal output in mice.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsConserved SequenceDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGlycosylationHEK293 CellsHumansMiceMolecular Sequence DataNIH 3T3 CellsProtein BindingProtein TransportReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionDrosophila ProteinsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSmoothened Receptorsmo protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID26291458
PMCPMC4546403
OpenAlexW1865923454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.