Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26291338›Full record

Trial reportNeurosurgery2015

Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.

David W Polly, Daniel J Cher, Kathryn D Wine, Peter G Whang, Clay J Frank, Charles F Harvey, Harry Lockstadt, John A Glaser, Robert P Limoni, Jonathan N Sembrano and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurosurgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01681004 nacompletednot on this map

INSITE Investigation of Sacroiliac Fusion Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorSI-BONE, Inc.Ran2012 to 2017Enrolled159ConditionsDegenerative Sacroiliitis, Sacroiliac Joint DisruptionArmsiFuse Implant System, Non-surgical management
NCT03230279 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial Of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Compared To Radiofrequency Ablation For Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

TypeinterventionalSponsorOchsner Health SystemRan2018 to 2024Enrolled0ConditionsSacroiliac Joint Somatic Dysfunction, Sacroiliac, SpondylitisArmsSacroiliac joint fusion, Sacroiliac joint radiofrequency ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Management of sacroiliac joint pain: current concepts.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effect of revision sacroiliac joint fusion on unresolved pain and disability: a retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

David W Polly*Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; ‡SI-BONE, Inc, San Jose, California; §Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; ¶Integrated Spine Care, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin; ‖Riverside Hospital, Kankakee, Illinois; #Bluegrass Orthopedics and Hand Care, Lexington, Kentucky; **Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; ‡‡Aurora BayCare Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Center, Green Bay, Wisconsin; §§Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Daniel J Cher
Kathryn D Wine
Peter G Whang
Clay J Frank
Charles F Harvey
Harry Lockstadt
John A Glaser
Robert P Limoni
Jonathan N Sembrano
INSITE Study Group
SI-Bone (United States) · USUniversity of Minnesota · USAurora BayCare Medical Center · USBluegrass Care Navigators · USMedical University of South Carolina · USPrecision Spine (United States) · USRiverside Community Hospital · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is a prevalent cause of chronic, unremitting lower back pain.

objectiveTo concurrently compare outcomes after surgical and nonsurgical treatment for chronic SIJ dysfunction.

methodsA total of 148 subjects with SIJ dysfunction were randomly assigned to minimally invasive SIJ fusion with triangular titanium implants (n = 102) or nonsurgical management (n = 46). Pain, disability, and quality-of-life scores were collected at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Success rates were compared using Bayesian methods. Crossover from nonsurgical to surgical care was allowed after the 6-month study visit was complete.

resultsSix-month success rates were higher in the surgical group (81.4% vs 26.1%; posterior probability of superiority > 0.9999). Clinically important (≥ 15 point) Oswestry Disability Index improvement at 6 months occurred in 73.3% of the SIJ fusion group vs 13.6% of the nonsurgical management group (P < .001). At 12 months, improvements in SIJ pain and Oswestry Disability Index were sustained in the surgical group. Subjects who crossed over had improvements in pain, disability, and quality of life similar to those in the original surgical group. Adverse events were slightly more common in the surgical group (1.3 vs 1.1 events per subject; P = .31).

conclusionThis Level 1 study showed that minimally invasive SIJ fusion using triangular titanium implants was more effective than nonsurgical management at 1 year in relieving pain, improving function, and improving quality of life in patients with SIJ dysfunction caused by degenerative sacroiliitis or SIJ disruptions. Pain, disability, and quality of life also improved after crossover from nonsurgical to surgical treatment.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAdultAgedCross-Over StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresProspective StudiesRadiographySacroiliac JointSpinal DiseasesSpinal FusionTime FactorsTitanium

Identifiers

PMID26291338
PMCPMC4605280
OpenAlexW1154777578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.