Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26291092›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2015

Comparison of Treatment Response in Idiopathic and Connective Tissue Disease-associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Rennie L Rhee, Nicole B Gabler, Sapna Sangani, Amy Praestgaard, Peter A Merkel, Steven M Kawut

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: from classical treatments to new horizons.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rennie L Rhee1 Division of Rheumatology.
Nicole B Gabler2 Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and.
Sapna Sangani1 Division of Rheumatology.
Amy Praestgaard2 Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and.
Peter A Merkel1 Division of Rheumatology.
Steven M Kawut2 Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and.
Center for Clinical Research (United States) · USCenter for Rheumatology · US

Funding

CLINICAL RESEARCH TRAINING IN KIDNEY DISEASET32DK007785 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FELDMAN, HAROLD I · 2000 to 2019
$3.9M
Mentored Patient-Oriented Research in Pulmonary Arterial HypertensionK24HL103844 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KAWUT, STEVEN M · 2011 to 2020
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL 103844NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL103844NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007785NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK07785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleStudies suggest that patients with connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (CTD-PAH) have a poorer treatment response to therapies for PAH compared with patients with idiopathic PAH (IPAH), but individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been underpowered to examine differences within these subgroups.

objectivesTo compare the effect of therapy for PAH in CTD-PAH versus IPAH.

methodsWe obtained individual participant data from phase III placebo-controlled RCTs of therapies for PAH submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for drug approval. A treatment-by-diagnosis interaction term evaluated differences in treatment response between CTD-PAH and IPAH. Outcomes included change in 6-minute-walk distance (∆6MWD) from baseline to 12 weeks, clinical worsening, and all-cause mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe study sample included 827 participants with CTD-PAH and 1,935 with IPAH from 11 RCTs. Patients with CTD-PAH had less improvement in 6MWD when assigned to active treatment versus placebo compared with patients with IPAH (difference in treatment effect on ∆6MWD in CTD-PAH vs. IPAH, -17.3 m; 90% confidence interval, -31.3 to -3.3; P for interaction = 0.043). Treatment was less effective in reducing the occurrence of clinical worsening in CTD-PAH versus IPAH (P for interaction = 0.012), but there was no difference in the placebo-adjusted effect of treatment on mortality (P for interaction = 0.65).

conclusionsTreatment for PAH was less effective in CTD-PAH compared with IPAH in terms of increasing 6MWD and preventing clinical worsening. The heterogeneity of treatment response supports the need for identifying therapies that are more effective for CTD-PAH.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsConnective Tissue DiseasesExercise TestFemaleHumansHypertension, PulmonaryMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeVasodilator AgentsAntihypertensive AgentsVasodilator Agentsclinical trialmeta-analysispulmonary hypertension

Identifiers

PMID26291092
PMCPMC4642205
OpenAlexW1954004200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.