Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26291080›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Single Doses up to 800 mg of E-52862 Do Not Prolong the QTc Interval--A Retrospective Validation by Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modelling of Electrocardiography Data Utilising the Effects of a Meal on QTc to Demonstrate ECG Assay Sensitivity.

Jörg Täubel, Georg Ferber, Ulrike Lorch, Duolao Wang, Mariano Sust, A John Camm

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Confirmation of the Cardiac Safety of PGFClinical pharmacology in drug development · 2018
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Morphological cell profiling of SARS-CoV-2 infection identifies drug repurposing candidates for COVID-19.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Cardiovascular Effects of a Meal: J-TJournal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Stability of the Effect of a Standardized Meal on QTc.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jörg TäubelRichmond Pharmacology Ltd., St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, United Kingdom; Cardiovascular and Cell Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, United Kingdom.
Georg FerberStatistik Georg Ferber GmbH, Cagliostrostrasse, Riehen, Switzerland.
Ulrike LorchRichmond Pharmacology Ltd., St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, United Kingdom.
Duolao WangDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Mariano SustDepartment of Clinical Investigation, ESTEVE Research & Development, Av. Mare de Déu de Montserrat, Barcelona, Spain.
A John CammCardiovascular and Cell Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, United Kingdom.
St George's, University of London · GBEsteve Química (Spain) · ESLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundE-52862 is a Sigma-1 receptor antagonist (S1RA) currently under investigation as a potential analgesic medicine. We successfully applied a concentration-effect model retrospectively to a four-way crossover Phase I single ascending dose study and utilized the QTc shortening effects of a meal to demonstrate assay sensitivity by establishing the time course effects from baseline in all four periods, independently from any potential drug effects.

methodsThirty two healthy male and female subjects were included in four treatment periods to receive single ascending doses of 500 mg, 600 mg or 800 mg of E-52862 or placebo. PK was linear over the dose range investigated and doses up to 600 mg were well tolerated. The baseline electrocardiography (ECG) measurements on Day-1 were time-matched with ECG and pharmacokinetic (PK) samples on Day 1 (dosing day).

resultsIn this conventional mean change to time-matched placebo analysis, the largest time-matched difference to placebo QTcI was 1.44 ms (90% CI: -4.04, 6.93 ms) for 500 mg; -0.39 ms (90% CI: -3.91, 3.13 ms) for 600 mg and 1.32 ms (90% CI: -1.89, 4.53 ms) for 800 mg of E-52862, thereby showing the absence of any QTc prolonging effect at the doses tested. In addition concentration-effect models, one based on the placebo corrected change from baseline and one for the change of QTcI from average baseline with time as fixed effect were fitted to the data confirming the results of the time course analysis.

conclusionThe sensitivity of this study to detect small changes in the QTc interval was confirmed by demonstrating a shortening of QTcF of -8.1 (90% CI: -10.4, -5.9) one hour and -7.2 (90% CI: -9.4, -5.0) three hours after a standardised meal.

trial registrationEU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT 2010 020343 13.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMorpholinesPyrazolesReceptors, sigmaRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult4-(2-((5-methyl-1-(2-naphthalenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)oxy)ethyl)morpholineMorpholinesPyrazolesReceptors, sigma

Identifiers

PMID26291080
PMCPMC4546378
OpenAlexW1639173097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.