Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26290885›Full record

ArticleEGEMS (Washington, DC)2015

Back to the Bedside: Developing a Bedside Aid for Concussion and Brain Injury Decisions in the Emergency Department.

Edward R Melnick, Kevin Lopez, Erik P Hess, Fuad Abujarad, Cynthia A Brandt, Richard N Shiffman, Lori A Post

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04140084 (Wiki Head CT Choice Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04140084 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Wiki Head CT Choice Study: Adaptation of Two Decision Aids to Support Shared Decision Making About Performing a Head CT for Adult and Pediatric Victims of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaval UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled40ConditionsMild Traumatic Brain Injury, Emergencies, Decision-makingArmsReal-life clinical meetings
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development of web- and mobile-based shared decision-making tools in the neurological intensive care unit.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Designing for impact: identifying stakeholder-driven interventions to support recovery after major cancer surgery.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dissemination and Implementation of Shared Decision Making Into Clinical Practice: A Research Agenda.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2016
    Article
  18. Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edward R MelnickYale School of Medicine.
Kevin LopezUniversity of Connecticut.
Erik P HessMayo Clinic.
Fuad AbujaradYale School of Medicine.
Cynthia A BrandtYale School of Medicine.
Richard N ShiffmanYale School of Medicine.
Lori A PostYale School of Medicine.

Funding

MEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH TRAINING AT YALET15LM007056 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Bender Gerstein, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 1987 to 2026
$22.2M
Clinical Decision Support for Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryK08HS021271 · AHRQ · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MELNICK, EDWARD ROBERT · 2013 to 2017
$772k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS021271NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextCurrent information-rich electronic health record (EHR) interfaces require large, high-resolution screens running on desktop computers. This interface compromises the provider's already limited time at the bedside by physically separating the patient from the doctor. The case study presented here describes a patient-centered clinical decision support (CDS) design process that aims to bring the physician back to the bedside by integrating a patient decision aid with CDS for shared use by the patient and provider on a touchscreen tablet computer for deciding whether or not to obtain a CT scan for minor head injury in the emergency department, a clinical scenario that could benefit from CDS but has failed previous implementation attempts. CASE DESCRIPTION: This case study follows the user-centered design (UCD) approach to build a bedside aid that is useful and usable, and that promotes shared decision-making between patients and their providers using a tablet computer at the bedside. The patient-centered decision support design process focuses on the prototype build using agile software development, but also describes the following: (1) the requirement gathering phase including triangulated qualitative research (focus groups and cognitive task analysis) to understand current challenges, (2) features for patient education, the physician, and shared decision-making, (3) system architecture and technical requirements, and (4) future plans for formative usability testing and field testing. LESSONS LEARNED: We share specific lessons learned and general recommendations from critical insights gained in the patient-centered decision support design process about early stakeholder engagement, EHR integration, external expert feedback, challenges to two users on a single device, project management, and accessibility.

conclusionsSuccessful implementation of this tool will require seamless integration into the provider's workflow. This protocol can create an effective interface for shared decision-making and safe resource reduction at the bedside in the austere and dynamic clinical environment of the ED and is generalizable for these purposes in other clinical environments as well.

Indexed as

InformaticsMethodsQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID26290885
PMCPMC4537154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.