ArticleEGEMS (Washington, DC)2015
Back to the Bedside: Developing a Bedside Aid for Concussion and Brain Injury Decisions in the Emergency Department.
Article in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04140084 (Wiki Head CT Choice Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Wiki Head CT Choice Study: Adaptation of Two Decision Aids to Support Shared Decision Making About Performing a Head CT for Adult and Pediatric Victims of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Agile User-Centered Design of a Clinical Research Project Management System in a Pediatric Health Institute.ACI open · 2025Article
- Evaluation method for public guidance service interface design based on improved grey H-Convex correlation model: integrating layout aesthetics and user visual cognition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of web- and mobile-based shared decision-making tools in the neurological intensive care unit.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- Article
- Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Clinicians' perspectives on the implementation of patient decision aids in the emergency department: A qualitative interview study.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022Article
- Factors Affecting the Initiation of a Shared Decision Making Program in Obstetric Practices.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Electronic clinical decision support for children with minor head trauma and intracranial injuries: a sociotechnical analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Integrating Option Grid Patient Decision Aids in the Epic Electronic Health Record: Case Study at 5 Health Systems.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Adapting two American Decision Aids for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury to the Canadian Context Using the Nominal Group Technique.The patient · 2020Article
- Designing for impact: identifying stakeholder-driven interventions to support recovery after major cancer surgery.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018Article
- Shared Decisionmaking in the Emergency Department: A Guiding Framework for Clinicians.Annals of emergency medicine · 2017Article
- Tablet-Based Patient-Centered Decision Support for Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department: Pilot Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2017Article
- Improving Primary Care Provider Practices in Youth Concussion Management.Clinical pediatrics · 2017Article
- Patient-Centered Decision Support: Formative Usability Evaluation of Integrated Clinical Decision Support With a Patient Decision Aid for Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Dissemination and Implementation of Shared Decision Making Into Clinical Practice: A Research Agenda.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2016Article
- Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2016Article
- CDS, UX, and System Redesign - Promising Techniques and Tools to Bridge the Evidence Gap.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextCurrent information-rich electronic health record (EHR) interfaces require large, high-resolution screens running on desktop computers. This interface compromises the provider's already limited time at the bedside by physically separating the patient from the doctor. The case study presented here describes a patient-centered clinical decision support (CDS) design process that aims to bring the physician back to the bedside by integrating a patient decision aid with CDS for shared use by the patient and provider on a touchscreen tablet computer for deciding whether or not to obtain a CT scan for minor head injury in the emergency department, a clinical scenario that could benefit from CDS but has failed previous implementation attempts. CASE DESCRIPTION: This case study follows the user-centered design (UCD) approach to build a bedside aid that is useful and usable, and that promotes shared decision-making between patients and their providers using a tablet computer at the bedside. The patient-centered decision support design process focuses on the prototype build using agile software development, but also describes the following: (1) the requirement gathering phase including triangulated qualitative research (focus groups and cognitive task analysis) to understand current challenges, (2) features for patient education, the physician, and shared decision-making, (3) system architecture and technical requirements, and (4) future plans for formative usability testing and field testing. LESSONS LEARNED: We share specific lessons learned and general recommendations from critical insights gained in the patient-centered decision support design process about early stakeholder engagement, EHR integration, external expert feedback, challenges to two users on a single device, project management, and accessibility.
conclusionsSuccessful implementation of this tool will require seamless integration into the provider's workflow. This protocol can create an effective interface for shared decision-making and safe resource reduction at the bedside in the austere and dynamic clinical environment of the ED and is generalizable for these purposes in other clinical environments as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.