ArticleBioMed research international2015
Demodex sp. as a Potential Cause of the Abandonment of Soft Contact Lenses by Their Existing Users.
Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the efficacy of tea tree (Parasitology · 2020Pooled it
- Patient-Reported Burden of Illness and Unmet Needs inPatient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary perspectives inJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2024Review
- Lotilaner Ophthalmic Solution, 0.25%, for the Treatment ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Prevalence ofClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- Psychosocial Impact ofClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- Effect of ocular demodicosis on the stability of the tear film and the tear break up time.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- In vitro demodicidal activity of commercial lid hygiene products.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019Article
- Contact lens wear and dry eyes: challenges and solutions.Clinical optometry · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Demodex mites may be a potential etiological factor in the development of various eye and skin disorders. The aim of the study was to investigate the presence of Demodex in the hair follicles of eyelashes and their potential influence on abandoning soft contact lenses which had been previously well tolerated by their users. A group of 62 users of contact lenses (28 with emerging discomfort and 34 without discomfort) were examined. There is a need to check the existence of a relationship between D. folliculorum or/and D. brevis infestation and the emergence of intolerance to the presence of soft contact lenses. The removed lashes were examined under light microscopy, applying standard parasitological methods if demodicosis is suspected. A positive result was assumed if at least one adult stage, larva, protonymph/nymph, or egg of D. folliculorum and/or D. brevis was present. A positive correlation was observed between the presence of Demodex and intolerance to contact lenses by their existing users (p < 0.05), and Demodex sp. infections were observed in 92.86% of patients with intolerance to contact lenses. Our results provide further evidence for the pathogenic role played by the mites in the development of eye diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.