Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26290826›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion perspectives2015

Promoting Evidence to Policy Link on the Control of Infectious Diseases of Poverty in Nigeria: Outcome of A Multi-Stakeholders Policy Dialogue.

Chigozie Jesse Uneke, Abel Ebeh Ezeoha, Henry Uro-Chukwu, Chinonyelum Thecla Ezeonu, Ogbonnaya Ogbu, Friday Onwe, Chima Edoga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion perspectives, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. An ethical analysis of policy dialogues.Health research policy and systems · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chigozie Jesse UnekeDepartment of Medical Microbiology/Parasitology, Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Ebonyi State University Abakaliki Nigeria ; Health Policy & systems Research Project (Knowledge Translation Platform), Ebonyi State University Abakaliki Nigeria.
Abel Ebeh EzeohaHealth Policy & systems Research Project (Knowledge Translation Platform), Ebonyi State University Abakaliki Nigeria ; Department of Banking & Finance, Ebonyi State University Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Henry Uro-ChukwuHealth Policy & systems Research Project (Knowledge Translation Platform), Ebonyi State University Abakaliki Nigeria ; National Obstetrics Fistula Centre, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Chinonyelum Thecla EzeonuHealth Policy & systems Research Project (Knowledge Translation Platform), Ebonyi State University Abakaliki Nigeria ; Department of Paediatrics, Ebonyi State University Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Ogbonnaya OgbuHealth Policy & systems Research Project (Knowledge Translation Platform), Ebonyi State University Abakaliki Nigeria ; Department of Applied Microbiology, Ebonyi State University Abakaliki Nigeria.
Friday OnweHealth Policy & systems Research Project (Knowledge Translation Platform), Ebonyi State University Abakaliki Nigeria ; Department of Sociology/Anthropology, Ebonyi State University Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Chima EdogaHealth Policy & systems Research Project (Knowledge Translation Platform), Ebonyi State University Abakaliki Nigeria ; Catholic Relief Services (Nigeria Program) Abakaliki, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Nigeria, malaria, schistosomiasis and lymphatic filariasis are among infectious diseases of poverty (IDP) with severe health burden and require effective policy strategies for their control. In this study, we investigated the value of policy brief and policy dialogue as excellent policymaking mechanisms that enable policymakers to adapt effective evidence informed policy for IDP control.

methodsA policy brief was developed on the control of malaria, schistosomiasis and lymphatic filariasis and subjected to deliberations in a one-day multi-stakeholder policy dialogue held in Ebonyi State Nigeria. A modified cross sectional intervention study design was used in this investigation. Structured pre-tested questionnaires were used to evaluate the policy brief document and policy dialogue process at the end of the policy dialogue.

resultsForty-seven policymakers participated in the dialogue. An analysis of the response on the policy brief regarding context, different features of the problem; policy options and key implementation considerations indicated the mean ratings (MNRs) mostly ranged from 6.40-6.85 on 7 point scale. The over-all assessment of the policy brief had MNR at 6.54. The analysis of the response on the policy dialogue regarding the level of priority of policy issue, opportunity to discuss different features of the problem and options for addressing the problem, and the MNRs mostly ranged from 6.50-6.82. The overall assessment of the policy dialogue had MNR at 6.72.

conclusionPolicy dialogues can allow research evidence to be considered together with views, experiences and tacit knowledge of policymakers and can enhance evidence-to-policy link.

Indexed as

Infectious diseasesPolicy briefPolicy dialoguePolicymakingPoverty

Identifiers

PMID26290826
PMCPMC4539051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.