ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2015
Discrimination of the commercial Korean native chicken population using microsatellite markers.
Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- The Effect of Different Freezing and Thawing Methods on Physicochemical, Sensory, and Flavor Characteristics of Korean Native Chicken Breast.Food science of animal resources · 2025Article
- Polymorphism analysis of tri- and tetranucleotide repeat microsatellite markers in Hanwoo cattle.Journal of animal science and technology · 2024Article
- Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study on the Content of Nucleotide-Related Compounds in Korean Native Chicken Breast Meat.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Application of genomic big data to analyze the genetic diversity and population structure of Korean domestic chickens.Journal of animal science and technology · 2023Article
- Physicochemical Characteristics and Flavor-Related Compounds of Fresh and Frozen-Thawed Thigh Meats from Chickens.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Single nucleotide polymorphism marker combinations for classifying Yeonsan Ogye chicken using a machine learning approach.Journal of animal science and technology · 2022Article
- Population structure analysis of Yeonsan Ogye using microsatellite markers.Journal of animal science and technology · 2020Article
- Major histocompatibility complex B variability in Korean native chicken breeds.Poultry science · 2020Article
- Genetic diversity of MHC-B in 12 chicken populations in Korea revealed by single-nucleotide polymorphisms.Immunogenetics · 2020Article
- Genetic characterization and population structure of six brown layer pure lines using microsatellite markers.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2019Article
- Estimation of linkage disequilibrium and analysis of genetic diversity in Korean chicken lines.PloS one · 2018Article
- A Major Locus for Quantitatively Measured Shank Skin Color Traits in Korean Native Chicken.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKorean native chicken (KNC) is a well-known breed due to its superior meat taste. This breed, however, owing to a low growth rate, has a high market price. In order to overcome this disadvantage, the National Institute of Animal Science (NIAS) in Korea developed a commercial KNC breed, named Woorimatdag version 2 (WM2), an upgraded version of the Woorimatdag (WM1) breed and the WM2 was created by crossing the KNC with meat type breeds. This study aims to discriminate between WM2 and other chicken breeds using microsatellite (MS) markers.
methodsA total of 302 individuals from eight Korean chicken populations were examined. The genetic diversity and population structure analysis were investigated using Cervus, API-CALC, STRUCTURE, PowerMarker programs.
resultsBased on heterozygosity and polymorphic information content (PIC) values, 30 MS markers were initially selected from 150 markers. The identified average number of alleles (Na), expected heterozygosity, and PIC values for the WM2 samples were 7.17, 0.741, and 0.682, respectively. Additionally, the paternity of individuals was assigned with a success rate of greater than 99% using 12 markers, the best minimum number of markers. The 12 selected markers contained heterozygosity and PIC values above 0.7 and probability of identity values around zero. Using these markers, the determined probability of identity (PI), PI half-sibs , and PI sibs values were 3.23E-33, 5.03E-22, and 8.61E-08, respectively.
conclusionsWM2 is well differentiated with respect to other chicken breeds based on estimated genetic distances. The results presented here will contribute to the identification of commercial WM2 chicken in the market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.