Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26290631›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Outcome of stenting in biliary and pancreatic benign and malignant diseases: A comprehensive review.

Benedetto Mangiavillano, Nico Pagano, Todd H Baron, Carmelo Luigiano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Endoscopic luminal stenting: Current applications and future perspectives.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Review
  9. Surgical Treatment of Distal Cholangiocarcinoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Current Status of Biliary Metal Stents.Clinical endoscopy · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benedetto MangiavillanoBenedetto Mangiavillano, Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, General Hospital of Sanremo, 18038 Sanremo, Italy.
Nico PaganoBenedetto Mangiavillano, Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, General Hospital of Sanremo, 18038 Sanremo, Italy.
Todd H BaronBenedetto Mangiavillano, Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, General Hospital of Sanremo, 18038 Sanremo, Italy.
Carmelo LuigianoBenedetto Mangiavillano, Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, General Hospital of Sanremo, 18038 Sanremo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic stenting has become a widely method for the management of various malignant and benign pancreatico-biliary disorders. Biliary and pancreatic stents are devices made of plastic or metal used primarily to establish patency of an obstructed bile or pancreatic duct and may also be used to treat biliary or pancreatic leaks, pancreatic fluid collections and to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. In this review, relevant literature search and expert opinions have been used to evaluate the outcome of stenting in biliary and pancreatic benign and malignant diseases.

Indexed as

StentsBiliary Tract DiseasesBiliary Tract NeoplasmsCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeHumansMetalsPancreatic DiseasesPancreatic NeoplasmsPlasticsProsthesis DesignTreatment OutcomeMetalsPlasticsComplicationsEndoscopic stentingLeaksPlastic stentSelf-expandable metal stentStrictures

Identifiers

PMID26290631
PMCPMC4533036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.