Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26290547›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of botany2015

Morphological diversity and evolution of Centrolepidaceae (Poales), a species-poor clade with diverse body plans and developmental patterns.

Dmitry D Sokoloff, Margarita V Remizowa, Matthew D Barrett, John G Conran, Paula J Rudall

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Reproductive development of common buckwheat (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dmitry D SokoloffDepartment of Higher Plants, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia.
Margarita V RemizowaDepartment of Higher Plants, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia.
Matthew D BarrettBotanic Gardens & Parks Authority, West Perth 6005, Western Australia School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, Western Australia Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, 6983, Western Australia.
John G ConranACEBB & SGC, School of Biological Sciences, Benham Bldg DX 650 312, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia.
Paula J RudallRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RUBotanic Gardens and Parks Authority · AURoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GBUniversity of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelled• PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The small primarily Australian commelinid monocot family Centrolepidaceae displays remarkably high structural diversity that has been hitherto relatively poorly explored. Data on Centrolepidaceae are important for comparison with other Poales, including grasses and sedges.•

methodsWe examined vegetative and reproductive morphology in a global survey of Centrolepidaceae based on light and scanning electron microscopy of 18 species, representing all three genera. We used these data to perform a cladistic analysis to assess character evolution.• KEY

resultsEach of the three genera is monophyletic; Centrolepis is sister to Aphelia. Some Centrolepidaceae show a change from spiral to distichous phyllotaxy on inflorescence transition. In Aphelia and most species of Centrolepis, several morphologically distinct leaf types develop along the primary shoot axis and flowers are confined to dorsiventral lateral spikelets. Centrolepis racemosa displays secondary unification of programs of leaf development, absence of the leaf hyperphyll and loss of shoot dimorphism. Presence or absence of a leaf ligule and features of inflorescence and flower morphology are useful as phylogenetic characters in Centrolepidaceae.•

conclusionsOntogenetic changes in phyllotaxy differ fundamentally between some Centrolepidaceae and many grasses. Inferred evolutionary transformations of phyllotaxy in Centrolepidaceae inflorescences also differ from those in grasses. In contrast with grasses, some Centrolepidaceae possess ligulate leaves where the ligule represents the boundary between the bifacial hypophyll and unifacial hyperphyll. All the highly unusual features of the morphological-misfit species Centrolepis racemosa could result from the same saltational event. Centrolepidaceae offer good perspectives for studies of evolutionary developmental biology.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPhylogenyAustraliaFalkland IslandsFlowersInflorescenceMagnoliopsidaMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningbractCentrolepidaceaedevelopmentevolutionflowerfruitgrassesinflorescenceleaftepal

Identifiers

PMID26290547
PMCPMC7159468
OpenAlexW2163335336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.