Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26290532›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2015

Stretch-induced increase in cardiac contractility is independent of myocyte Ca2+ while block of stretch channels by streptomycin improves contractility after ischemic stunning.

Samhita S Rhodes, Amadou K S Camara, Mohammed Aldakkak, James S Heisner, David F Stowe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Synchronized mechanical oscillations at the cell-matrix interface in the formation of tensile tissue.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Rabbit models of cardiac mechano-electric and mechano-mechanical coupling.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samhita S RhodesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA School of Engineering, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
Amadou K S CamaraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA Cardiovascular Research Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Mohammed AldakkakDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
James S HeisnerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
David F StoweDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA Cardiovascular Research Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA Research Service, Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA dfstowe@mcw.edu.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USMarquette University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stretching the cardiac left ventricle (LV) enhances contractility but its effect on myoplasmic [Ca(2+)] is controversial. We measured LV pressure (LVP) and [Ca(2+)] as a function of intra-LV stretch in guinea pig intact hearts before and after 15 min global stunning ± perfusion with streptomycin (STM), a stretch-activated channel blocker. LV wall [Ca(2+)] was measured by indo-1 fluorescence and LVP by a saline-filled latex balloon inflated in 50 μL steps to stretch the LV. We implemented a mathematical model to interpret cross-bridge dynamics and myofilament Ca(2+) responsiveness from the instantaneous relationship between [Ca(2+)] and LVP ± stretching. We found that: (1) stretch enhanced LVP but not [Ca(2+)] before and after stunning in either control (CON) and STM groups, (2) after stunning [Ca(2+)] increased in both groups although higher in STM versus CON (56% vs. 39%), (3) STM-enhanced LVP after stunning compared to CON (98% vs. 76% of prestunning values), and (4) stretch-induced effects on LVP were independent of [Ca(2+)] before or after stunning in both groups. Mathematical modeling suggested: (1) cooperativity in cross-bridge kinetics and myofilament Ca(2+) handling is reduced after stunning in the unstretched heart, (2) stunning results in depressed myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity in the presence of attached cross-bridges regardless of stretch, and (3) the initial mechanism responsible for increased contractility during stretch may be enhanced formation of cross-bridges. Thus stretch-induced enhancement of contractility is not due to increased [Ca(2+)], whereas enhanced contractility after stunning in STM versus CON hearts results from improved Ca(2+) handling and/or enhanced actinomyosin cross-bridge cycling.

Indexed as

Contractilitycross‐bridgesheartmathematical modelingmyoplasmic calciumstretch channels

Identifiers

PMID26290532
PMCPMC4562572
OpenAlexW2153880935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.