Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26290473›Full record

ReviewHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2016

Risk stratification in autoimmune cholestatic liver diseases: Opportunities for clinicians and trialists.

Palak J Trivedi, Christophe Corpechot, Albert Pares, Gideon M Hirschfield

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. TheEClinicalMedicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Portal pressure is of significant prognostic value in primary biliary cholangitis.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2023
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Palak J TrivediNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Birmingham Liver Biomedical Research Unit (BRU), and Center for Liver Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Christophe CorpechotNational Reference Center for Inflammatory Diseases of the Biliary Tract (MIVB), Rare Liver Diseases Health Network (FILFOIE), Saint-Antoine Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France.
Albert ParesLiver Unit, Hospital Clínic, CIBERehd, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Gideon M HirschfieldNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Birmingham Liver Biomedical Research Unit (BRU), and Center for Liver Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
National Institute for Health Research · GBAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ES

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L001489/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are infrequent autoimmune cholestatic liver diseases, that disproportionate to their incidence and prevalence, remain very important causes of morbidity and mortality for patients with liver disease. Mechanistic insights spanning genetic risks and biological pathways to liver injury and fibrosis have led to a renewed interest in developing therapies beyond ursodeoxycholic acid that are aimed at both slowing disease course and improving quality of life. International cohort studies have facilitated a much greater understanding of disease heterogeneity, and in so doing highlight the opportunity to provide patients with a more individualized assessment of their risk of progressive liver disease, based on clinical, laboratory, or imaging findings. This has led to a new approach to patient care that focuses on risk stratification (both high and low risk); and furthermore allows such stratification tools to help identify patient subgroups at greatest potential benefit from inclusion in clinical trials. In this article, we review the applicability and validity of risk stratification in autoimmune cholestatic liver disease, highlighting strengths and weaknesses of current and emergent approaches. (Hepatology 2016;63:644-659).

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesCholangitis, SclerosingClinical Trials as TopicHumansLiver Cirrhosis, BiliaryRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID26290473
PMCPMC4864755
OpenAlexW1862351738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.