ArticleActa neuropathologica2015
Erratum to: Distribution of dipeptide repeat proteins in cellular models and C9orf72 mutation cases suggests link to transcriptional silencing.
Article in Acta neuropathologica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-expression of C9orf72 related dipeptide-repeats over 1000 repeat units reveals age- and combination-specific phenotypic profiles in Drosophila.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2020Article
- C9orf72 is differentially expressed in the central nervous system and myeloid cells and consistently reduced in C9orf72, MAPT and GRN mutation carriers.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a result of an error during digital processing of Figure 1a for publication, one of the immunofluorescence panels (GA175-GFP Nucleolin staining) was accidentally strongly altered in contrast and brightness. The corrected version of the figure is shown below. The authors apologize for any confusion caused by this error. In the published article, the collaborators from the two institutions, German Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Bavarian Brain Banking Alliance, were incorrectly listed in article note. These names have been relocated to the Appendix section in the article now.Figure 1a and the collaborators list have been amended in the published article.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.