Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26290380›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2015

Comparison of Deconvolution-Based and Absorption Modeling IVIVC for Extended Release Formulations of a BCS III Drug Development Candidate.

Filippos Kesisoglou, Binfeng Xia, Nancy G B Agrawal

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Chiral 4-Drug delivery · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Filippos KesisoglouBiopharmaceutics, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Clinical Supply, Merck & Co. Inc., WP75B-210, West Point, Pennsylvania, 19486, USA. filippos_kesisoglou@merck.com.
Binfeng XiaBiopharmaceutics, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Clinical Supply, Merck & Co. Inc., WP75B-210, West Point, Pennsylvania, 19486, USA.
Nancy G B AgrawalPharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co. Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania, 19486, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVC) are predictive mathematical models describing the relationship between dissolution and plasma concentration for a given drug compound. The traditional deconvolution/convolution-based approach is the most common methodology to establish a level A IVIVC that provides point to point relationship between the in vitro dissolution and the in vivo input rate. The increasing application of absorption physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PBPK) has provided an alternative IVIVC approach. The current work established and compared two IVIVC models, via the traditional deconvolution/convolution method and via absorption PBPK modeling, for two types of modified release (MR) formulations (matrix and multi-particulate tablets) of MK-0941, a BCS III drug development candidate. Three batches with distinct release rates were studied for each formulation technology. A two-stage linear regression model was used for the deconvolution/convolution approach while optimization of the absorption scaling factors (a model parameter that relates permeability and input rate) in Gastroplus(TM) Advanced Compartmental Absorption and Transit model was used for the absorption PBPK approach. For both types of IVIVC models established, and for either the matrix or the multiparticulate formulations, the average absolute prediction errors for AUC and C max were below 10% and 15%, respectively. Both the traditional deconvolution/convolution-based and the absorption/PBPK-based level A IVIVC model adequately described the compound pharmacokinetics to guide future formulation development. This case study highlights the potential utility of absorption PBPK model to complement the traditional IVIVC approaches for MR products.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal AbsorptionModels, BiologicalBenzamidesChemistry, PharmaceuticalDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug DiscoveryHumansSulfones3-((6-(ethylsulfonyl)-3-pyridinyl)oxy)-5-(2-hydroxy-1-methylethoxy)-N-(1-methyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)benzamideBenzamidesDelayed-Action PreparationsSulfonesabsorption modelingdeconvolutionin vitro–in vivo correlation (IVIVC)modified releasephysiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling

Identifiers

PMID26290380
PMCPMC4627461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.