Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26290231›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Cortical Coupling Reflects Bayesian Belief Updating in the Deployment of Spatial Attention.

Simone Vossel, Christoph Mathys, Klaas E Stephan, Karl J Friston

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Brain networks for confidence weighting and hierarchical inference during probabilistic learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Revisiting the role of computational neuroimaging in the era of integrative neuroscience.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Thalamus as a Blackboard for Perception and Planning.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simone VosselWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom, Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany, s.vossel@fz-juelich.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6351-8849
Christoph MathysWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom, Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom, Translational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland, and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4079-5453
Klaas E StephanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom, Translational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland, and Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, 50931 Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8594-9092
Karl J FristonWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-8909

Funding

Wellcome Trust 088130Wellcome Trust 091593Wellcome Trust 091593/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deployment of visuospatial attention and the programming of saccades are governed by the inferred likelihood of events. In the present study, we combined computational modeling of psychophysical data with fMRI to characterize the computational and neural mechanisms underlying this flexible attentional control. Sixteen healthy human subjects performed a modified version of Posner's location-cueing paradigm in which the percentage of cue validity varied in time and the targets required saccadic responses. Trialwise estimates of the certainty (precision) of the prediction that the target would appear at the cued location were derived from a hierarchical Bayesian model fitted to individual trialwise saccadic response speeds. Trial-specific model parameters then entered analyses of fMRI data as parametric regressors. Moreover, dynamic causal modeling (DCM) was performed to identify the most likely functional architecture of the attentional reorienting network and its modulation by (Bayes-optimal) precision-dependent attention. While the frontal eye fields (FEFs), intraparietal sulcus, and temporoparietal junction (TPJ) of both hemispheres showed higher activity on invalid relative to valid trials, reorienting responses in right FEF, TPJ, and the putamen were significantly modulated by precision-dependent attention. Our DCM results suggested that the precision of predictability underlies the attentional modulation of the coupling of TPJ with FEF and the putamen. Our results shed new light on the computational architecture and neuronal network dynamics underlying the context-sensitive deployment of visuospatial attention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Spatial attention and its neural correlates in the human brain have been studied extensively with the help of fMRI and cueing paradigms in which the location of targets is pre-cued on a trial-by-trial basis. One aspect that has so far been neglected concerns the question of how the brain forms attentional expectancies when no a priori probability information is available but needs to be inferred from observations. This study elucidates the computational and neural mechanisms under which probabilistic inference governs attentional deployment. Our results show that Bayesian belief updating explains changes in cortical connectivity; in that directional influences from the temporoparietal junction on the frontal eye fields and the putamen were modulated by (Bayes-optimal) updates.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdultAttentionBayes TheoremComputer SimulationCuesFemaleHumansNeuronal PlasticityPutamenSaccadesSpatial ProcessingVisual FieldsYoung Adultattentional networksBayesian inferencefMRIsaccadesspatial cueing

Identifiers

PMID26290231
PMCPMC4540794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.