Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015
Cortical Coupling Reflects Bayesian Belief Updating in the Deployment of Spatial Attention.
Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain networks for confidence weighting and hierarchical inference during probabilistic learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Trial
- Brain Dynamics Underlying Reaching Movements Under Uncertainty.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Learning-based cognitive control: developmental trajectories in children aged 5- to 14- years.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Computational origins of cortical brain circuits for social cognition.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- Corticocerebellar Effective Connectivity During Adapting to vs. Ignoring Delayed Visual Movement Feedback.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Contextual Updating in Attentional Orienting Relies on the Right Temporoparietal Junction: Evidence From rTMS.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Load-dependent processing of prediction violations in task-irrelevant space.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Revisiting the role of computational neuroimaging in the era of integrative neuroscience.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Attentional guidance through object associations in visual cortex.Science advances · 2024Article
- Erroneous predictive coding across brain hierarchies in a non-human primate model of autism spectrum disorder.Communications biology · 2024Article
- The Projective Consciousness Model: Projective Geometry at the Core of Consciousness and the Integration of Perception, Imagination, Motivation, Emotion, Social Cognition and Action.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Reaction Time "Mismatch Costs" Change with the Likelihood of Stimulus-Response Compatibility.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Article
- A quantitative model reveals a frequency ordering of prediction and prediction-error signals in the human brain.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Human's Intuitive Mental Models as a Source of Realistic Artificial Intelligence and Engineering.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- On the Influence of Spatial and Value Attentional Cues Across Individuals.Journal of cognition · 2022Article
- Feedback from lateral occipital cortex to V1/V2 triggers object completion: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic causal modeling.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Difficulties with Speech-in-Noise Perception Related to Fundamental Grouping Processes in Auditory Cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021Article
- Incentive value and spatial certainty combine additively to determine visual priorities.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- The Thalamus as a Blackboard for Perception and Planning.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
- Attentional reorientation along the meridians of the visual field: Are there different neural mechanisms at play?Human brain mapping · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The deployment of visuospatial attention and the programming of saccades are governed by the inferred likelihood of events. In the present study, we combined computational modeling of psychophysical data with fMRI to characterize the computational and neural mechanisms underlying this flexible attentional control. Sixteen healthy human subjects performed a modified version of Posner's location-cueing paradigm in which the percentage of cue validity varied in time and the targets required saccadic responses. Trialwise estimates of the certainty (precision) of the prediction that the target would appear at the cued location were derived from a hierarchical Bayesian model fitted to individual trialwise saccadic response speeds. Trial-specific model parameters then entered analyses of fMRI data as parametric regressors. Moreover, dynamic causal modeling (DCM) was performed to identify the most likely functional architecture of the attentional reorienting network and its modulation by (Bayes-optimal) precision-dependent attention. While the frontal eye fields (FEFs), intraparietal sulcus, and temporoparietal junction (TPJ) of both hemispheres showed higher activity on invalid relative to valid trials, reorienting responses in right FEF, TPJ, and the putamen were significantly modulated by precision-dependent attention. Our DCM results suggested that the precision of predictability underlies the attentional modulation of the coupling of TPJ with FEF and the putamen. Our results shed new light on the computational architecture and neuronal network dynamics underlying the context-sensitive deployment of visuospatial attention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Spatial attention and its neural correlates in the human brain have been studied extensively with the help of fMRI and cueing paradigms in which the location of targets is pre-cued on a trial-by-trial basis. One aspect that has so far been neglected concerns the question of how the brain forms attentional expectancies when no a priori probability information is available but needs to be inferred from observations. This study elucidates the computational and neural mechanisms under which probabilistic inference governs attentional deployment. Our results show that Bayesian belief updating explains changes in cortical connectivity; in that directional influences from the temporoparietal junction on the frontal eye fields and the putamen were modulated by (Bayes-optimal) updates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.