Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26290103›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2015

Lesser suppression of energy intake by orally ingested whey protein in healthy older men compared with young controls.

Caroline Giezenaar, Laurence G Trahair, Rachael Rigda, Amy T Hutchison, Christine Feinle-Bisset, Natalie D Luscombe-Marsh, Trygve Hausken, Karen L Jones, Michael Horowitz, Ian Chapman and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline GiezenaarDiscipline of Medicine and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, South-Australia, Australia;
Laurence G TrahairDiscipline of Medicine and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, South-Australia, Australia;
Rachael RigdaDiscipline of Medicine and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, South-Australia, Australia;
Amy T HutchisonDiscipline of Medicine and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, South-Australia, Australia;
Christine Feinle-BissetDiscipline of Medicine and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, South-Australia, Australia;ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6848-0125
Natalie D Luscombe-MarshDiscipline of Medicine and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, South-Australia, Australia; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Animal, Food and Health Sciences, Adelaide, Australia; and.
Trygve HauskenDiscipline of Medicine and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, South-Australia, Australia; Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Karen L JonesDiscipline of Medicine and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, South-Australia, Australia;
Michael HorowitzDiscipline of Medicine and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, South-Australia, Australia;
Ian ChapmanDiscipline of Medicine and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, South-Australia, Australia;
Stijn SoenenDiscipline of Medicine and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, South-Australia, Australia; stijn.soenen@adelaide.edu.au.
National Health and Medical Research Council · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUHaukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-rich supplements are used widely for the management of malnutrition in young and older people. Protein is the most satiating of the macronutrients in young. It is not known how the effects of oral protein ingestion on energy intake, appetite, and gastric emptying are modified by age. The aim of the study was to determine the suppression of energy intake by protein compared with control and underlying gastric-emptying and appetite responses of oral whey protein drinks in eight healthy older men (69-80 yr) compared with eight young male controls (18-34 yr). Subjects were studied on three occasions to determine the effects of protein loads of 30 g/120 kcal and 70 g/280 kcal compared with a flavored water control-drink (0 g whey protein) on energy intake (ad libitum buffet-style meal), and gastric emptying (three-dimensional-ultrasonography) and appetite (0-180 min) in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over design. Energy intake was suppressed by the protein compared with control (P = 0.034). Suppression of energy intake by protein was less in older men (1 ± 5%) than in young controls (15 ± 2%; P = 0.008). Cumulative energy intake (meal+drink) on the protein drink days compared with the control day increased more in older (18 ± 6%) men than young (1 ± 3%) controls (P = 0.008). Gastric emptying of all three drinks was slower in older men (50% gastric-emptying time: 68 ± 5 min) than young controls (36 ± 5 min; P = 0.007). Appetite decreased in young, while it increased in older (P < 0.05). In summary, despite having slower gastric emptying, elderly men exhibited blunted protein-induced suppression of energy intake by whey protein compared with young controls, so that in the elderly men, protein ingestion increased overall energy intake more than in the young men.

Indexed as

AgingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodEnergy IntakeGastric EmptyingHumansMaleWhey ProteinsYoung AdultWhey Proteinsagingappetiteenergy intakegastric emptyingwhey protein

Identifiers

PMID26290103
PMCPMC4666943
OpenAlexW1889053297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.