Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26290016›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2016

Gestational carrier BMI and reproductive, fetal and neonatal outcomes: are the risks the same with increasing obesity?

K Coyne, L D Whigham, K O'Leary, J K Yaklic, R A Maxwell, S R Lindheim

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K CoyneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA.
L D WhighamPaso del Norte Institute for Healthy Living, El Paso, TX, USA.
K O'LearyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA.
J K YaklicDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA.
R A MaxwellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA.
S R LindheimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA.
Wright State University · USWright-Patterson Air Force Base · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveData suggest that female obesity impairs uterine receptivity and increases the risk of fetal and neonatal mortality. We analyzed the reproductive outcomes of gestational carriers (GCs) undergoing donated oocytes and assisted reproductive technology according to body mass index (BMI).

designA retrospective analysis of 163 GCs undergoing 226 in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer cycles.

methodsGCs undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer cycles were analyzed and divided according to their BMI (healthy weight: 20-24.9 kg m(-2) (n=77 in 114 cycles); overweight: 25-29.9 kg m(-)(2) (n=55 in 71 cycles); and obese: 30-35 kg m(-)(2) (n=31 in 41 cycles)). All GCs underwent a complete medical evaluation and were cleared for pregnancy before being selected. Overweight and obese GCs also underwent a metabolic screening, including an oral glucose tolerance test and lipid profile. The main outcomes measured were clinical pregnancy and live birth rates, antenatal and neonatal outcomes.

resultsClinical pregnancy and live birth rates were similar despite increasing BMI. There were no statistically significant differences in the implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates or live birth rates per embryo transfer among patients in the three BMI groups. In the healthy weight, overweight and obese GCs, the clinical pregnancy rates per GC were 72%, 84% and 79%, and per embryo transfer rates were 52%, 49% and 56%, respectively; P=NS. The live birth rates per GC were 70%, 84% and 75%, and per embryo transfer rates were 50%, 49% and 53%, respectively; P=NS. Twin rates were similar between the groups (35%, 31% and 29%, respectively; P=NS). There were no differences in gestational diabetes, preterm admissions or cesarean section rates. Neonatal intensive care unit admissions were similar (11%, 13% and 12%, respectively; P=NS), and no maternal, neonatal or infant mortality occurred.

conclusionsThese data show that increasing obesity does not impair the reproductive outcome in GC cycles. Larger sample size is indicated to verify these findings. Furthermore, this study suggests that the standard metabolic screening used for GCs may lead to selection of healthier patients compared with women of comparable BMI who conceive outside of a fertility clinic setting, indicating the metabolic profile, rather than BMI, may better explain differences in pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

Gestational CarriersAdultBody Mass IndexEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfant, NewbornObesityPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeReproductive HealthRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26290016
OpenAlexW1524980594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.