Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26289560›Full record

ArticleTrials2015

Core Outcomes in Ventilation Trials (COVenT): protocol for a core outcome set using a Delphi survey with a nested randomised trial and observational cohort study.

Bronagh Blackwood, Suzanne Ringrow, Mike Clarke, John Marshall, Louise Rose, Paula Williamson, Danny McAuley

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Understanding and Enhancing Sepsis Survivorship. Priorities for Research and Practice.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bronagh BlackwoodCentre for Infection and Immunity, Queen's University Belfast, Health Sciences Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland. b.blackwood@qub.ac.uk.
Suzanne RingrowCentre for Infection and Immunity, Queen's University Belfast, Health Sciences Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland. sringrow01@qub.ac.uk.
Mike ClarkeNorthern Ireland Network for Trials Methodology Research, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, BT12 6BA, Northern Ireland. m.clarke@qub.ac.uk.
John MarshallLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. marshallj@smh.ca.
Louise RoseLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. louise.rose@utoronto.ca.
Paula WilliamsonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Shelley's Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GS, UK. p.r.williamson@liverpool.ac.uk.
Danny McAuleyCentre for Infection and Immunity, Queen's University Belfast, Health Sciences Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland. d.f.mcauley@qub.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901530Medical Research Council MR/K025635/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong clinical trials of interventions that aim to modify time spent on mechanical ventilation for critically ill patients there is considerable inconsistency in chosen outcomes and how they are measured. The Core Outcomes in Ventilation Trials (COVenT) study aims to develop a set of core outcomes for use in future ventilation trials in mechanically ventilated adults and children. METHODS/

designWe will use a mixed methods approach that incorporates a randomised trial nested within a Delphi study and a consensus meeting. Additionally, we will conduct an observational cohort study to evaluate uptake of the core outcome set in published studies at 5 and 10 years following core outcome set publication. The three-round online Delphi study will use a list of outcomes that have been reported previously in a review of ventilation trials. The Delphi panel will include a range of stakeholder groups including patient support groups. The panel will be randomised to one of three feedback methods to assess the impact of the feedback mechanism on subsequent ranking of outcomes. A final consensus meeting will be held with stakeholder representatives to review outcomes. DISCUSSION: The COVenT study aims to develop a core outcome set for ventilation trials in critical care, explore the best Delphi feedback mechanism for achieving consensus and determine if participation increases use of the core outcome set in the long term.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessDelphi TechniqueRespiration, ArtificialConsensusConsensus Statements as TopicHumansObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26289560
PMCPMC4545990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.