Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26289463›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Generalization of motor resonance during the observation of hand, mouth, and eye movements.

Alessandra Finisguerra, Laura Maffongelli, Michela Bassolino, Marco Jacono, Thierry Pozzo, Alessandro D'Ausilio

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Action Observation and Effector Independency.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alessandra FinisguerraRobotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Umane, Università Degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy;
Laura MaffongelliRobotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy;
Michela BassolinoRobotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy; Center for Neuroprosthetics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; and.
Marco JaconoRobotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy;
Thierry PozzoRobotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy; IUF, INSERM U1093 Cognition, Action et Plasticité Sensorimotrice, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Alessandro D'AusilioRobotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy; alessandro.dausilio@iit.it.
Italian Institute of Technology · ITÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHInserm · FRUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex shows that hand action observation (AO) modulates corticospinal excitability (CSE). CSE modulation alternatively maps low-level kinematic characteristics or higher-level features, like object-directed action goals. However, action execution is achieved through the control of muscle synergies, consisting of coordinated patterns of muscular activity during natural movements, rather than single muscles or object-directed goals. This synergistic organization of action execution also underlies the ability to produce the same functional output (i.e., grasping an object) using different effectors. We hypothesize that motor system activation during AO may rely on similar principles. To investigate this issue, we recorded both hand CSE and TMS-evoked finger movements which provide a much more complete description of coordinated patterns of muscular activity. Subjects passively watched hand, mouth and eyelid opening or closing, which are performing non-object-directed (intransitive) actions. Hand and mouth share the same potential to grasp objects, whereas eyelid does not allow object-directed (transitive) actions. Hand CSE modulation generalized to all effectors, while TMS evoked finger movements only to mouth AO. Such dissociation suggests that the two techniques may have different sensitivities to fine motor modulations induced by AO. Differently from evoked movements, which are sensitive to the possibility to achieve object-directed action, CSE is generically modulated by "opening" vs. "closing" movements, independently of which effector was observed. We propose that motor activities during AO might exploit the same synergistic mechanisms shown for the neural control of movement and organized around a limited set of motor primitives.

Indexed as

EyeMouthAccelerometryBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorEye MovementsFemaleFingersHumansMaleMotion PerceptionMotor ActivityMotor CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationVideo Recordingaction observation networkcorticospinal excitabilityfinger kinematicsmotor generalizationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID26289463
PMCPMC4609760
OpenAlexW1885957966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.