Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26289427›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2015

CicArVarDB: SNP and InDel database for advancing genetics research and breeding applications in chickpea.

Dadakhalandar Doddamani, Aamir W Khan, Mohan A V S K Katta, Gaurav Agarwal, Mahendar Thudi, Pradeep Ruperao, David Edwards, Rajeev K Varshney

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Towards Exploitation of Adaptive Traits for Climate-Resilient Smart Pulses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dadakhalandar DoddamaniResearch Program Grain Legumes, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502 324, Telangana State, India.
Aamir W KhanResearch Program Grain Legumes, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502 324, Telangana State, India.
Mohan A V S K KattaResearch Program Grain Legumes, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502 324, Telangana State, India.
Gaurav AgarwalResearch Program Grain Legumes, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502 324, Telangana State, India.
Mahendar ThudiResearch Program Grain Legumes, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502 324, Telangana State, India.
Pradeep RuperaoSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia 4072, School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia 6009 and.
David EdwardsSchool of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia 6009 and Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia 6009.
Rajeev K VarshneyResearch Program Grain Legumes, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502 324, Telangana State, India, School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia 6009 and r.k.varshney@cgiar.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular markers are valuable tools for breeders to help accelerate crop improvement. High throughput sequencing technologies facilitate the discovery of large-scale variations such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and simple sequence repeats (SSRs). Sequencing of chickpea genome along with re-sequencing of several chickpea lines has enabled the discovery of 4.4 million variations including SNPs and InDels. Here we report a repository of 1.9 million variations (SNPs and InDels) anchored on eight pseudomolecules in a custom database, referred as CicArVarDB that can be accessed at http://cicarvardb.icrisat.org/. It includes an easy interface for users to select variations around specific regions associated with quantitative trait loci, with embedded webBLAST search and JBrowse visualisation. We hope that this database will be immensely useful for the chickpea research community for both advancing genetics research as well as breeding applications for crop improvement. Database URL: http://cicarvardb.icrisat.org.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidINDEL MutationPlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociCicerCrops, AgriculturalSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26289427
PMCPMC4541373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.