Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26289145›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2016

The Dual Hypocretin Receptor Antagonist Almorexant is Permissive for Activation of Wake-Promoting Systems.

Gregory S Parks, Deepti R Warrier, Lars Dittrich, Michael D Schwartz, Jeremiah B Palmerston, Thomas C Neylan, Stephen R Morairty, Thomas S Kilduff

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Emerging and upcoming therapies in insomnia.Translational and clinical pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory S ParksSRI International, Center for Neuroscience, Biosciences Division, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Deepti R WarrierSRI International, Center for Neuroscience, Biosciences Division, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Lars DittrichSRI International, Center for Neuroscience, Biosciences Division, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Michael D SchwartzSRI International, Center for Neuroscience, Biosciences Division, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Jeremiah B PalmerstonSRI International, Center for Neuroscience, Biosciences Division, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Thomas C NeylanDepartment of Psychiatry, SF VA Medical Center/NCIRE/University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Stephen R MorairtySRI International, Center for Neuroscience, Biosciences Division, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Thomas S KilduffSRI International, Center for Neuroscience, Biosciences Division, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
SRI International · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Travel support for U.S.-Japan Brain Research Colllaborative ProgramR01NS077408 · NINDS · SRI INTERNATIONAL · PI KILDUFF, THOMAS S · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS077408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dual hypocretin receptor (HcrtR) antagonist almorexant (ALM) may promote sleep through selective disfacilitation of wake-promoting systems, whereas benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BzRAs) such as zolpidem (ZOL) induce sleep through general inhibition of neural activity. Previous studies have indicated that HcrtR antagonists cause less-functional impairment than BzRAs. To gain insight into the mechanisms underlying these differential profiles, we compared the effects of ALM and ZOL on functional activation of wake-promoting systems at doses equipotent for sleep induction. Sprague-Dawley rats, implanted for EEG/EMG recording, were orally administered vehicle (VEH), 100 mg/kg ALM, or 100 mg/kg ZOL during their active phase and either left undisturbed or kept awake for 90 min after which their brains were collected. ZOL-treated rats required more stimulation to maintain wakefulness than VEH- or ALM-treated rats. We measured Fos co-expression with markers for wake-promoting cell groups in the lateral hypothalamus (Hcrt), tuberomammillary nuclei (histamine; HA), basal forebrain (acetylcholine; ACh), dorsal raphe (serotonin; 5HT), and singly labeled Fos(+) cells in the locus coeruleus (LC). Following SD, Fos co-expression in Hcrt, HA, and ACh neurons (but not in 5HT neurons) was consistently elevated in VEH- and ALM-treated rats, whereas Fos expression in these neuronal groups was unaffected by SD in ZOL-treated rats. Surprisingly, Fos expression in the LC was elevated in ZOL- but not in VEH- or ALM-treated SD animals. These results indicate that Hcrt signaling is unnecessary for the activation of Hcrt, HA, or ACh wake-active neurons, which may underlie the milder cognitive impairment produced by HcrtR antagonists compared to ZOL.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAnimalsBrainCholinergic NeuronsElectroencephalographyElectromyographyHistamineIsoquinolinesMaleNeuronsOrexin Receptor AntagonistsOrexinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosPyridinesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAcetamidesalmorexantHcrt protein, ratHistamineIsoquinolinesOrexin Receptor AntagonistsOrexinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosPyridinesZolpidem

Identifiers

PMID26289145
PMCPMC4748439
OpenAlexW2401331947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.