Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26289072›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Reliable scaling of position weight matrices for binding strength comparisons between transcription factors.

Xiaoyan Ma, Daphne Ezer, Carmen Navarro, Boris Adryan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Harnessing regulatory networks in Actinobacteria for natural product discovery.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaoyan MaDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK. xm227@cam.ac.uk.
Daphne EzerDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK. de276@cam.ac.uk.
Carmen NavarroCambridge Systems Biology Center, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK. cnluzon@decsai.ugr.es.
Boris AdryanDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK. ba255@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScoring DNA sequences against Position Weight Matrices (PWMs) is a widely adopted method to identify putative transcription factor binding sites. While common bioinformatics tools produce scores that can reflect the binding strength between a specific transcription factor and the DNA, these scores are not directly comparable between different transcription factors. Other methods, including p-value associated approaches (Touzet H, Varré J-S. Efficient and accurate p-value computation for position weight matrices. Algorithms Mol Biol. 2007;2(1510.1186):1748-7188), provide more rigorous ways to identify potential binding sites, but their results are difficult to interpret in terms of binding energy, which is essential for the modeling of transcription factor binding dynamics and enhancer activities.

resultsHere, we provide two different ways to find the scaling parameter λ that allows us to infer binding energy from a PWM score. The first approach uses a PWM and background genomic sequence as input to estimate λ for a specific transcription factor, which we applied to show that λ distributions for different transcription factor families correspond with their DNA binding properties. Our second method can reliably convert λ between different PWMs of the same transcription factor, which allows us to directly compare PWMs that were generated by different approaches.

conclusionThese two approaches provide computationally efficient ways to scale PWM scores and estimate the strength of transcription factor binding sites in quantitative studies of binding dynamics. Their results are consistent with each other and previous reports in most of cases.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPosition-Specific Scoring MatricesAnimalsBinding SitesChromatin ImmunoprecipitationComputational BiologyDNADrosophila melanogasterHumansProtein BindingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsVertebratesDNATranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26289072
PMCPMC4545934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.